Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.O.P. Candidates Criticize Slur by Conservative Author [Ann Coulter]
The New York Times ^ | 3/4/07 | ADAM NAGOURNEY

Posted on 03/04/2007 1:18:25 AM PST by XR7

WASHINGTON, March 3 — Three of the leading Republican presidential candidates on Saturday denounced one of their party’s best-known conservative commentators for using an antigay epithet when discussing a Democratic presidential contender at a gathering of conservatives here.

The remarks by Ann Coulter, an author who regularly speaks at conservative events, were sharply denounced by the candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona, Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. Their statements came after Democrats, gay rights groups and bloggers raised a storm of protest over the remarks.

Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference before an overflow crowd on Friday, Ms. Coulter said, “I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards.”

Mr. Edwards’s aides responded with an e-mail message that attacked Ms. Coulter and urged supporters to donate to Mr. Edwards’s campaign. “John was singled out for a personal attack because the Republican establishment knows he poses the greatest threat to their power,” said his campaign manager, David E. Bonior. “Since they have nothing real to use against him, Coulter’s resorting to the classic right-wing strategy of riling up hate to smear a progressive champion.”

Ms. Coulter, asked for a reaction to the Republican criticism, said in an e-mail message: “C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; anncoulter; coulter; edwards2008; embarrassment; fags; gaystapo; kowtow; lavendermafia; macacamoment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-164 next last
To: Jhensy

I wouldn't do anything. If I were a weenie spined lib, I would cry to the media and try to hold all those horrible Republicans feet to the fire for what you said. I am quite confident of my own sexuality, so I wouldn't even whop you upside the head. I might just chuckle at you. Then, I would forget about it.


61 posted on 03/04/2007 5:33:15 AM PST by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
I wouldn't do anything. If I were a weenie spined lib, I would cry to the media and try to hold all those horrible Republicans feet to the fire for what you said. I am quite confident of my own sexuality, so I wouldn't even whop you upside the head. I might just chuckle at you. Then, I would forget about it.

Well, for the record I wasn't saying it was me calling you a slur, but some anonymous person.

And I still think most people would rightfully deck the person calling them a faggot.

62 posted on 03/04/2007 5:55:48 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
And the Republican leadership wonders why it got its Butt kicked back in November...

They seem to think the Mark Foley strategy will work.

I am sick of the perverts. Ann Coulter would make a better president.

No joke. I saw this cartoon on yesterday's thread and it fits perfectly, so will repost it today as well.


63 posted on 03/04/2007 5:58:40 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The dims and Ron Paul screwed our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
Will you say the same about Duncan Hunter when he criticizes her?

Without hesitation.

64 posted on 03/04/2007 5:59:48 AM PST by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: advance_copy


Coulter is supporting Romney as of now.


66 posted on 03/04/2007 6:01:57 AM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy

Do you mean that liberal little sissy boy Edwards would actually deck someone ? He is the type that would probably hire someone for that duty. I think he will just flip his hair in protest. LOL


67 posted on 03/04/2007 6:03:57 AM PST by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy


I can't believe how many people here think what Ann said was a good thing.

The joke was classless, and stupid.

As Rush says, there has to be some nugget of truth for a joke to be funny. John Edwards isn't gay. The joke bombed.


68 posted on 03/04/2007 6:05:25 AM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy


69 posted on 03/04/2007 6:14:14 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

What the h3ll is wrong with some of you people? This is only the second Ann thread I've been on because I can't believe some of you sanctimonious twits. By her using the word 'faggot' you compare her to Duke. Get a grip.Why should I be concerned she upsets rinos? More power to her.


70 posted on 03/04/2007 6:18:18 AM PST by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

"She is an American who is free to express her opinion even if you don't like it."

So are the candidates that were critical of her comments.

Am I to assume that the view of some here is that Ann is free to "express" herself without response while these candidates are not?


71 posted on 03/04/2007 6:20:04 AM PST by VanDeKoik (Have a bit of humor today. You wont be able to stand this crap for 15 minutes if you dont!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

"I can't believe some of you sanctimonious twits. "

For being critical of an adult women having to stoop to calling another person a "faggot" just to make a point?

How many of you go around in your daily lives and call people this?

To 99% of this nation it is an incredibly offensive term to use against another person. Maybe in your circle it's tossed around freely, but in the wider society, it's just immature.


72 posted on 03/04/2007 6:26:26 AM PST by VanDeKoik (Have a bit of humor today. You wont be able to stand this crap for 15 minutes if you dont!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Get a life!


73 posted on 03/04/2007 6:27:14 AM PST by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

The difference is is that the candidates are "expected" to respond. You are right. They can say what they want, so can Ann. However, she did not diss them. They could respond by asking people to refer to Ann about her own comment. If you didn't say it, why worry? Best to just ignore it.


74 posted on 03/04/2007 6:29:15 AM PST by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

"The Iraq war not going well is why the Dems won last November."

Go ahead and post all the links, polls, and reasoned analysis supporting your statement.

I'll wait.


75 posted on 03/04/2007 6:31:11 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
OK. So if Obama comes out tomorrow and says that Condi Rice is a Bulldyke Houseni**er, you would expect that she just chuckle about it & forget it.

The reason many folks, at least decent folks who prefer to avoid the charges of hypocrisy, are upset with Ann about this is that she cheapens the discourse & smears all conservatism when she with her thoughtless ugly "jokes". She plays right into the hoary old charge that all conservatives are vicious knee-jerking neanderthals, that the religious right are all clucking meanspirirted hypocrites.

And for what purpose? Just so she can get a few titters for a ridiculously immature 'joke'? She deliberately sabotages all the coalition-builders out there trying desperately to grow the base for conservatism just so she can get her name in the headlines & sell a few more books?

Despite the fact that the amen chorus around here gets off on Ann's self-serving schtick which damages the party & dilutes the message, most of the people conservatives must persuade in order to prevail at election-time,aka Mr. & Mrs. Flyover Country, hear this & say:"Know what? I don't think I want to be identified with those creeps. They clearly don't have anything to say so they just poison the debate by attacking the opposition with juvenile nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah ad hominems."

We're supposed to be the adults here. A certain "sunny optimist" we all knew & loved must be turning in his grave.

76 posted on 03/04/2007 6:31:26 AM PST by leilani (Lunar Eclipse tonight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

"Get a life!"

Ok, are you really a poster on this site or some DU guy just trolling?


77 posted on 03/04/2007 6:33:48 AM PST by VanDeKoik (Have a bit of humor today. You wont be able to stand this crap for 15 minutes if you dont!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
What a bunch of pansies! Bootlicker brown nosers, I swear! No wonder the dhimmicrats won the house and senate. If this is offensive to you, and is little more than a comment in the election cycle, get over yourself!

We only want to be on the side that's winning...Reminds of a song from Bob Dylan "Positively Forth Street"

Giuliani, Romney, McCain...suckpumps all, say anything for a vote, no spine, or principle. Make jOnF'n skerry a rookie when it comes to flip floppin.


Only conservatives that have shown up for the race currently are Hunter,Gingrich, and Fred Thompson.

The lady calls it like she sees it. She was right then...



Right now!

We seem to have a lot of effeminate men in the party who, for whatever ignorant reason, love to rail against Ann...Maybe they really support the "dynamic duo"...


If the faggot title fits, stick it on. What did you expect from a couple of "John's" that the local "working girls" refused to have anything to do with?


78 posted on 03/04/2007 6:34:09 AM PST by Issaquahking (Pardon Compean and Ramos Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: XR7

LOL!!! I LOVE that picture!!!


79 posted on 03/04/2007 6:34:44 AM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik; processing please hold

See # 78, Processing please hold is right, get a life!


80 posted on 03/04/2007 6:37:18 AM PST by Issaquahking (Pardon Compean and Ramos Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson