"If Rudy beats Hillary in polls, let him run in the Democratic primary where he belongs and get the Demonicrat Nomination."
Your lack of understanding of elections and lack of logic is astounding.
The objective in nominating the right Republican nominee is to nominate someone who can beat the Dem nominee. Do you think Ronald Reagan should have run as a Democrat, because he did beat his Dem opponents?
Your lack of logic is astounding.
If you don't have the common sense to see that a thrice married candidate is never going to win, then you are utterly delusional in your devotion to Giuliani.
ANYONE CAN BEAT HILLARY
for crying out loud why run a pole cat against a skunk?
Giuliani is a Democrat but in name only. Reagan defined what it meaned to be Republican.
Giuliani ain't no Ronald Reagan.
That's a stretch. Ronald Reagan had led the conservative movement for years before being elected. He ran a solid conservative campaign against Gerald Ford. He had real credentials going back to the Goldwater campaign. Rudy has none of that. He has been a solid leftist for years. He has some rightward tendencies, very few of them, but he is not a conservative. You are attempting to compare the leader of contemporary conservatism, a ground breaking idealist, with an eastern liberal of dubious morality and integrity. It doesn't work. He may be acceptable to you. That's fine. But his views are closer to Arlen Specter's than Ronald Reagan's.
Your tone this thread is very condescending. You won't persuade anyone being that way. I've interacted with you and know we can be civil. My best to you.