Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter, You're No Sister Souljah
The Politico ^ | 3 March 2007 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 03/03/2007 8:01:55 PM PST by llevrok

Ann Coulter is not African-American, does not sing and never said “If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people?” However, she is the closest the Republicans will get to Sister Souljah.

Coulter has made a career of interspersing insightful and cutting political criticism with outrageous and morally repugnant remarks. She attracted considerable attention with her crack about the group of 9/11 widows dubbed the “Jersey girls,” with a line in one of her books, “These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them. ... I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much.”

Then, there was her crack about Muslims at last year’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC): “I think our motto should be post-9-11, ‘rag head talks tough, rag head faces consequences.’” At CPAC on Thursday, in endorsing Republican presidential aspirant Mitt Romney, who needs more bad press like a hole in the head, she piped up with this one: “I was going to say something about John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot.’”

It's about time for a presidential contender, perhaps all of them in the spirit of Newt Gingrich’s crusade for improving public discourse, to say “enough.” Coulter’s never-ending stream of venom is not amusing, unhelpful to Republicans, and not in keeping with the ideals of a party that fancies itself as the proponent of a colorblind society and heir to Lincoln.

It is not “caving” into political correctness to distance and indeed condemn such remarks as unworthy of a political event like CPAC. To the contrary, it is altogether fitting that a group that ostensibly searches for the best in conservative ideas, rewards political courage and encourages intellectual debate, should be able to differentiate the amusing from the offensive, and the clever from the vile.

Conservatives take great glee in condemning ideological opponents who share stages with Al Sharpton or give a convention seat to Michael Moore. It would certainly boost their credibility to toss their own baggage out.

Would it be a stunt to call out Coulter, who obviously revels in the attention of provocative pronouncements? No. Excommunication is not being suggested, just a public rebuke. By clearly stating her comments are beyond the bounds of civil discourse and her presence not a welcome addition to a mature political party, the Republicans could do themselves a world of good. How often does a party have the opportunity to display some measure of dignity, restraint and self-reflection.?

So who will play the role of Bill Clinton to Coulter’s Sister Souljah? It would be a sad commentary on the GOP if the answer is “no one.”

Jennifer Rubin is a writer who lives in Virginia. Her columns appear in the Weekly Standard, the American Spectator, Human Events, abc.com and National Review Online.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; cpac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last
To: llevrok
So who will play the role of Bill Clinton to Coulter’s Sister Souljah?

I can't wait to hear what Ann will say if someone tries it.

21 posted on 03/03/2007 8:26:30 PM PST by donna (NMMFF! - No more moral free fall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
If it wasn't for Coulter, the ideological goal posts would move further and further to the left by the leftists themselves. A conservative make a perceived controversial comment - other conservatives and Republicans are supposed to condemn those comments, which discourages conservatives and allow the Left to move the issues that much further to the left.

The hand-wringers and others who would rather lick the boots of their masters instead of standing up and fight clearly cannot understand this.

22 posted on 03/03/2007 8:27:05 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Good night Chesty, wherever you are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Well, if we conservatives are going to draw a line in the dirt over Jennifer and Ann, I am crossing the line over to Ann's side.


23 posted on 03/03/2007 8:28:05 PM PST by snoringbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

Imagine if Ann had used the name Ken Melhman instead of John Edwards. Or David Drier.

Would we have found that to be funny?


24 posted on 03/03/2007 8:28:05 PM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: llevrok; All
Frankly, Ann is an exception only because she's hated by the left. If she was the stock and trade RINO lapdog, she wouldn't receive the hate she does. But, she's unafraid to put a finger (a middle one at that) right into the eye of the beast. So now, all of the moralists of the right become as shocked, shocked, SHOCKED as their leftist counterparts. In truth, Ann is somewhat understated.

We're living in a time not far from knuckles and bullets, we're losing ground to lying, treasonous hypocrites, and our nation is edging closer to terrorist destruction or the abyss of self-inflicted collapse and (cough) our side is pleading for civility - as if that ever mattered one iota to any of our enemies!

To my thinking, having the manners to say please and thank you when you're forced to kiss somebody's @ss isn't civility - it's servility.
25 posted on 03/03/2007 8:28:51 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (a.k.a. What a jackass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Funny how some jokes fall flat only AFTER the fact, when certain pundits scratch their behinds and get the clever idea that they can make themselves look good to the liberal "mainstream" newsrooms by pretending to take "the high road" - - in other words, they run like scared bunnies.


26 posted on 03/03/2007 8:31:40 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
We are better than those effing left wingers.

This attitude is precisely why conservatives are fed up with the GOP and the party got its ass kicked in the mid-terms.

27 posted on 03/03/2007 8:32:11 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Good night Chesty, wherever you are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Everyone knows he's one of the "Breck" girls.


28 posted on 03/03/2007 8:32:54 PM PST by SouthTexas (It's race time again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I would not thought it terribly funny.

That is not my point. the point is WHO gets to engage in ridicule. The Left can and the Right cannot not.

It is immoral for Conservatives to make fun of Liberals. It is moral for Liberals to make fun of conservatives. Ridicule is part of the progressive demeanor which sets them 'above' and 'beyond' stodgy old conservatives.

This hoax is entrenched in the media and academia. I think conservatives allow themselves to fall into this rhetorical trap. It is conservatism which is actually more progressive for humanity, yet they fear they are mere traditionalists defending the old order.

The old order is truly the fascist, socialist, tyrannies that pious leftists have eternally proferred in one vain order upon another.

It is conservatives that liberate, but they fear rather than jeer.

Jeer away Ann.


29 posted on 03/03/2007 8:35:12 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The hand-wringers and others who would rather lick the boots of their masters...

Exactly. The left wants to control 'speech' - thus, they gave us PC. And the hand ringers march to the 'obedient' drum.

The day flag burning is no longer free speech - is the day I say Ann is out of line.
30 posted on 03/03/2007 8:35:37 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
To my thinking, having the manners to say please and thank you when you're forced to kiss somebody's @ss isn't civility - it's servility.

Are the Democrats the Normans, and the conservatives the "Saxon dogs"?

31 posted on 03/03/2007 8:35:49 PM PST by an amused spectator (The 1st Minnesota Regt died fighting a culture which embraced slavery. Think about it, Ellison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist


Faggot? Since when is that an appropriate word to use in a speech at a political convention?

In a smoky bar, fine.

She's a damn phony. One of her best buds is a "faggot". Matt Drudge.


32 posted on 03/03/2007 8:36:33 PM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
"Imagine if Ann had used the name Ken Melhman instead of John Edwards. Or David Drier. Would we have found that to be funny?"

If she used it about Foley then yes, that would have been funny.

33 posted on 03/03/2007 8:37:34 PM PST by bluecollarman (awaiting tag line inspiration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
What's next Ann, blackface and the n-word? Talk about leading with your jaw. She is not dumb. She had to know the reaction use of a word most of us outgrew in junior high would cause. I've enjoyed her writing and wit for a long time, but I'm beginning to wonder if Ann is selling out the causes she claims to support for personal (and dishonorable) motives.

Her effectiveness has been teetering lately because she's always on the defensive for some provocative comment or another. I didn't mind her "kill their leaders and convert them.." comment and she was right on about the Jersey Girls, if stated a bit to forwardly for public consumption. She's lost me with this. I just can't get behind somebody tone-deaf enough to yell "faggot" from a public podium.

34 posted on 03/03/2007 8:37:39 PM PST by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
. . . we're losing ground to lying, treasonous hypocrites, and our nation is edging closer to terrorist destruction or the abyss of self-inflicted collapse and (cough) our side is pleading for civility - as if that ever mattered one iota to any of our enemies!

Worth repeating.

35 posted on 03/03/2007 8:39:06 PM PST by Liberty Wins (Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten these.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

We can't ridicule?

Have you not seen how much ridicule has been heaped onto Al Gore over the past week?

Good, well deserved ridicule. On the web, talk radio and even on TV.


36 posted on 03/03/2007 8:39:28 PM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Just now clicking on my music icon to listen to "I'm In Love With Ann Coulter" by the Right Brothers. I'm in the mood right now.


37 posted on 03/03/2007 8:39:45 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
The scorn dynamic allows liberals to control conservatives even when they are in power.
Well said. Time we had leaders with conviction, and thick skins, who will be dismissive enough to put scorn in its place.
38 posted on 03/03/2007 8:40:03 PM PST by voletti (There's no place, I can be, since I found, serenity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Go get em Annie. Please continue to piss off liberals and fairy RINO's because both groups are nothing but scabs anyhow !!!


39 posted on 03/03/2007 8:40:25 PM PST by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn

Why? Are we scared of Faggots? If we are, how did we get that way?


40 posted on 03/03/2007 8:40:50 PM PST by bluecollarman (awaiting tag line inspiration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson