I denounce Giuliani, Romney, McCain.
Actually, the liberals should be pleased. After all, Ann's just trailer park white trash of the NASCAR right, and speaks accordingly.
(((((PING)))))
....I don't want to hear about what liberals do, I don't want to aspire to act like liberals....Ann takes the low road and now alot of the attention is on her remarks and she gets what she wants....I'm not bashing her underlying political philosophy, I'm questioning her timing and tactics....and NO, I'm NOT offended....
You've got to pick your battles.
Ann is on her own. And she probably loves the attention.
I find Giuliani, Romney, and McCain's politics a lot more offensive than Anne indirectly calling Edwards some name. Nobody cares when Al Franken gets high and drunk and assaults conservative columnists at public events, which he does on a regular basis. But suddenly this is a huge scandal? The liberals on a daily basis call Bush and our military far worse names and accuse them of doing far worse things.
Practice what you preach, DemLibs! You have smeared more Republican politicians that McDonald's fries Big Macs.
Without Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin, reading these days would be too dull to give our time to.
Lighten up, Francis. Save this sort of moralizing for the South Park threads where it's needed.
The real tragedy is that Giuliani, Romney and McCain are the "front runners."
Well, if the republicans played by democrat rules, then they would lash back by saying, "Ah, but the important question should be '*Is* Edwards a faggot'?"
Remember that it's the seriousness of the charge that matters, not the quality of the evidence. (Justice Thomas hearing.)
I too think it was terrible that Ann declined to call Edwards a "faggot".
I also think Lenny Bruce should be disinterred and his body tarred and feathered- in a socially and politically conscious manner. Of course it should be done in an environmentally responsible way too!
And the RINOS stampede to please the MSM.
A properly done denunciation would be rubbing it in still more, something along the lines: "although the former senator edwards looks like a homosexual, it may well be that he actually is not one, despite his uncanny resemblance to the homosexual type.... therefore any suggestion that he actually is a homosexual is to be withdrawn as unsubstantiated until such time when it is clearly proven that he is a homosexual..".
What word can we use, if we can't call them Democrats any more?
I hope FoxNews cuts her loose too. No serious person should be associated with her. If you get close to a skunk, you're going to end up stinking eventually.
Ann displayed the kind of lack of character we are, unfortunately, seeing far too much of. People who sling personal insults, attacks and ridicule on a pretty much daily basis - cannot claim to be principled conservatives, imo.
Notwithstanding the political incorrectness of her remark, Ann's email answer to the Times was priceless!!
Ann is replacing Pat Buchanan as the conservative journalist that we always have to apologize for.
(And btw, don't you know the Ann Coulter picture rule?)
Ann Coulter is a terrific writer and as sharp as a whip. Not only does she say exactly what she thinks, she puts it quite sharply. It's what makes her both entertaining and controversial.
The good part of Ann Coulter's acerbic style is that, right or wrong, she is unfailingly entertaining. The downside is that sometimes she goes too far. But her readers take the bad with the good, and not only are we entertained, we also appreciate her boldness and enjoy her insight.