To: MovementConservative
I don't get it. According to the left, there's nothing wrong with being a homosexual. It's a "good thing". If there's nothing wrong with being a homosexual, then why are people offended when it's hinted that someone is a homosexual?
7 posted on
03/03/2007 2:36:21 PM PST by
DouglasKC
To: DouglasKC
....because it is a ill timed slur....some African Americans refer to each other as ni**er....and I'm sure most blacks are proud to be black....so would it be ok if Ann got up and called Obama a ni**er?....many here may think he is and feel that way....but using the slurs in that way only serve to give them ammo
To: DouglasKC
I don't get it. According to the left, there's nothing wrong with being a homosexual. It's a "good thing". If there's nothing wrong with being a homosexual, then why are people offended when it's hinted that someone is a homosexual? And blacks should be ok at being called the *N* word as well?
31 posted on
03/03/2007 2:46:11 PM PST by
Sunsong
To: DouglasKC
I should have read ahead. Yours is the more articulate statement.
58 posted on
03/03/2007 2:55:44 PM PST by
NCLaw441
To: DouglasKC
There's nothing wrong with being black according to anybody, but if Colter were to call Obama (or, perhaps Hillary, seeming as how Edwards is not, in fact, a homosexual) a "N!@@er", she'd rightly be castigated, as she should be here.
To: DouglasKC
Not to point out any inconvenient facts but isn't the alleged homosexual the one with natural offspring?
317 posted on
03/03/2007 5:37:25 PM PST by
Natchez Hawk
(Conservative=liberal after their car is stolen. Libertarian=conservative after their car is towed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson