Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican lawmaker withdraws support of child savings bill ($500 account for every baby born in CA)
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 3/3/07 | AP

Posted on 03/03/2007 2:02:55 PM PST by NormsRevenge

A Republican lawmaker who co-authored a bill that would give every child born in California a $500 savings account has withdrawn his support following a backlash within his own party.

Sen. Bob Dutton, R-Rancho Cucamonga, who had promoted the measure as a good investment, announced Friday he no longer supported the bill he had introduced two days before with Democrat Sen. Darrel Steinberg.

The surprise move came after fellow Republicans questioned the measure's $285 million cost and inclusion of children of illegal immigrants.

In a press release, Dutton said that thousands of Californians had asked him "what I was thinking" over the past 48 hours. Although he defended the savings account idea as a way for Republicans to help individuals become self-sufficient, Dutton said he could not support the bill because of the state's deteriorating fiscal stability.

"In light of the state's deteriorating fiscal situation, I cannot support the bill as currently written," Dutton said in a statement.

Under the measure, every child born in California after Jan. 1, 2008, would receive the money in a savings account. They could withdraw the money once they turn 18 for education expenses, a down payment on a home or retirement. It would cost taxpayers about $285 million a year.

Among the critics was state Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, who sent an e-mail to his supporters saying the bill would create "a new wave of illegal immigration."

Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said hysteria over immigration had pressured his colleague to withdraw his support.

"Let's get one thing straight: 90 percent of the calls and the talk radio and all the hysteria is about one issue and one issue only - immigration," Steinberg said. "It is all about xenophobia and there is a lot of hatred out there and we need to stand up against it. A kid is a kid is a kid."

If the bill is passed, California would be the first state in the nation with child savings accounts. A similar national savings program has been pending in Congress since 2005.

About 566,000 children are expected to be born in California next year.

If families added $50 a month to the state's initial contribution, the savings account would grow to nearly $17,500 at 5 percent interest over 18 years.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; child; lawmaker; republican; savings; support; withdraws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: NormsRevenge
Question:

Are the children of Illegal immigrants eligible for the $500 birthing bonus?

If so -- we will be further subsidizing the invasion of the brood mares and fornicators..

It would be interesting to have heard the discussion on the eligibility issues:
1. Are children born to unwed mothers eligible?
2. Are children born to single sex "couples", eligible?
3. Are children born as a result of incest, eligible?
4. Are children born to illegal aliens/residents eligible?
5. Are children born to the multiple wives of those that practice polygamy eligible?
6. Are children born to aliens in the Nation legally on a temporary visa - like tourists, students, contract employees, etc, etc..., eligible?

If so - aren't we increasing the attraction and subsidizing those we should NOT be financing?

This is another idiotic idea of the Leftists to purchase votes and swing open the door more fully to legalization of the illegal invasion.

If the Democrats REALLY want to do "something for the children" -- END Public Education, Teacher's Unions and subsidize the cost of children going to PRIVATELY operated schools from preschool through University Levels...

Our Public Schools have become NOTHING but indoctrination centers for every leftist wacky bullshit idea riding in on a drunken horse.

Semper Fi
21 posted on 03/03/2007 3:22:44 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liege
It will never happen. This is the problem here in NJ, almost 650,000 residents belong to a state workers union, add in their relatives and retirees and it's a no win situation. Not to mention the welfare contingent. The majority of New Jersians are on the government dole in one way or another. The dims have figured out that handing out crumbs will attract the stupid voter. Getting votes is more important than a balanced budget! I don't think that Middle Class in NJ can take much more BS.
22 posted on 03/03/2007 3:31:46 PM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (As for me, I will remain neutral...for the time being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: liege
Would that take an amendment appeal?

If you mean repeal, then yes. It would require a constitutional amendment voiding Amendment XXVI.

23 posted on 03/03/2007 3:34:07 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

It's not a very "appealing" amendment.


24 posted on 03/03/2007 3:36:04 PM PST by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"a bill that would give every child born in California a $500 savings account "

Is the political class absolutely crazy?

It's not enough to look the other way while a tidal wave of illegals crashes over the border -- now, the pols want to pay the illegals to have kids here, too!


25 posted on 03/03/2007 4:43:19 PM PST by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Yes, it's important that Republicans send the message that individuals must be self-sufficient, and the best way to do that is by giving them government handouts. / s


26 posted on 03/03/2007 4:45:23 PM PST by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

They could withdraw the money once they turn 18 for education expenses, a down payment on a home or retirement.

RETIREMENT at 18? The ultimate liberal dream!


27 posted on 03/03/2007 5:18:10 PM PST by a_different_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson