Guess you never heard of paragraphs!
Yeah, like, they're still around? After our lawyers sent them notification that they had to excerpt all our articles about guns, instead of reproducing them in their entirety, they'd run out of things to say to one another and the site would whither up and go away. But golly, they're still here, all these years later, talking about guns!
Note to the NYT, any weapon used to assault someone becomes an assault weapon.
We all just a bunch of Gun Totin, God Fearin backwood Rednecks on here right?
This ain't nothin but a bunch of New York City boys yakin bout sometin they don't know beans about. They need to come down yonder and get taste of some real Prarie dogs...
At LEAST he's getting it!
It is supPOSED to be!
Due to technological advances, the AR is today's equivalent of yesterday's rifles the Minutemen and farmers used against the British and the Hessians.
Sure can!
Read the above!!
Earth to NYT, the word H U N T I N G is no where to be found in the Consitution of the United States of America, and especially not specifically in the Second Amendment thereto.
i don't know why they mention FR... this place was a day late on zumbo...
No, douche bags. No one hates Mr. Brady, no one rational, anyway. We hate his wife, who has exploited a seriously injured man for her own reasons. Just like liberals claim they do - we hate the exploiter, not the exploited.
“ban” is the mother of all fighting words to gun zealots.
How about "ban" is the mother of all wet dreamns to anti-gun zealots? (Like the cockroach who wrote this article)
"...they might have asked Mr. Zumbo what he was talking about. They might even have had a healthy debate."
Uh-hugh. Let's find out why someone that owns a particluar object is a terrorist? No, a better debate is at hand--why does the de-facto paper of record for the US have such low standards. Zumbo got thumped and needed it. He was thumped by his marketplace. He is a fool that wants to promote the idea that hunting is a fraternity of which he has the power of cersure.
"...they might have asked Mr. Zumbo what he was talking about. They might even have had a healthy debate."
Uh-hugh. Let's find out why someone that owns a particluar object is a terrorist? No, a better debate is at hand--why does the de-facto paper of record for the US have such low standards. Zumbo got thumped and needed it. He was thumped by his marketplace. He is a fool that wants to promote the idea that hunting is a fraternity of which he has the power of cersure.
I mean I never heard of him, never saw a single post about him in countless hours of reading FreeRepublic, but still, apparently, according to the New York Times, I'm outraged. ("Rabble, rabble, rabble, rabble.")
I love how all the liberals are racing to this man's defense all of a sudden when they didn't even know or care who the hell he was up until a nanosecond before the crap hit the fan regarding his remarks.
This is just another consequence of his stupid remarks. He gave the antis a club to hit gun owners over the head with for as long as they can use it.
Guns are Good. Nice discussion.
PRay for W and Our Troops
Dear NY SLIMES: While you keep failing to understand the US Constitution, we will keep sending you the scalps of the like-minded. No apology is made for denying you the ability to use the words of a "respected gun-rights advocate" to push for gun control - you are just going to have to put more effort into playing the role of the Useful Idiot for the Democrats. No soup for you.
It's a shame about Zumbo but he should have known not to say something like that in his column. Now he'll have to go into rehab ;)