WHY HILLARY'S MAGICALLY APPEARING THESIS IS LIKE CLINTON'S FOLEY HIT (not like her billing records)

Frontline (PBS), MSNBC | 3.03.07 | Mia T

[Mia T]

WHY HILLARY'S MAGICALLY APPEARING THESIS IS LIKE CLINTON'S FOLEY HIT JOB
(and not like her Rose Law Firm billing records)

 

 

by Mia T, 3.03.07

 

 

 

illary's thesis hit the fan just in time to stop the bleeding. Another week of falling stars ¹ and dropping numbers ² and Barack Obama would have missus clinton dead and buried before the IRS ³ could say "David Geffen." ⁴

The means of delivery was MSNBC "investigative" reporter Bill Dedman's scoop, ⁵ Reading Hillary Rodham's hidden thesis.

The online article announced to the world that ms. rodham's senior thesis, sealed, closed to public scrutiny since 1993 when it was ordered buried by herr hillary decree, was now available in the Wellesley College archives for anyone who cared to read it, (and had been so ever since the clintons left the White House (if not all its furnishings ⁶)).

Was this 'breaking story' fortuitous timing for hillary clinton? Or was it, rather, clinton sleight of hand engineered to stop the bleeding by shifting the world's attention from hillary clinton's fall from grace to hillary rodham's "youthful indiscretions"???

It is the latter option that is supported by the facts. Consider them:

• Agenda-driven, clinton-friendly venue breaks the story.

• Imprimatur ("Pulitzer-Prize winning" "investigative" reporter) plastered on the byline and in the bio.

• "Investigative" reporter fails to describe explicitly the motivation for his '"investigation."

• Post-hoc ticking off of Barbara Olson, Peggy Noonan and Free Republic as the impetus looks a heck of a lot like reverse engineering.

• The timing, which includes three separate issues:
  1. Must stop Geffen-induced bleeding

  2. Tell It Early, Tell It All, ⁷ Tell It Yourself (The Lanny Davis crook's rule: Spin your baggage before your enemies do)

  3. Tell It on Friday.

   

 

---

 7. It is still an open question whether the thesis is THE thesis. As we know, the clintons and their useful-idiot supporters are not beyond altering, redacting, shredding, socking away and otherwise revising the evidence.

THE CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO: THE SERIES

• HILLARY! Can a chintzed-and-powdered villain win the White House?
  LEADING INDICATORS SAY 'NO'
  MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART SIX
  CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART SIX
  
  

• HILLARY MEANS 'GANGSTER POLITICS, DUAL MONARCHY
  AND THE MORAL CONSISTENCY OF A DOORKNOB'
  CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART FIVE
  
  

• AL GORE, THE OSCAR, THE NOBEL, THE CLINTONS + DAVID GEFFEN
  CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART FOUR
  
  

• HEAR DENNIS MILLER: WHY GEFFEN DUMPED HILLARY,
  WHY CLINTON 'DOES NOT WANT TO LOCK HORNS WITH DAVID GEFFEN'
  CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART THREE (video and transcript)
  
  

• CLINTON vs. GORE + GEFFEN: POST-OSCAR ANALYSIS
  (HAS HOLLYWOOD DUMPED HILLARY?)
  CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART TWO
  
  

• WHY THE GEFFEN IMBROGLIO SIGNALS CLINTON'S END
  'HILLARY'S STRATEGY--NOBODY GETS TO CRITICIZE HER' -- CHRIS MATTHEWS
  with a WARNING FOR DAVID GEFFEN
  CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBOGLIO-PART ONE
  

 

'KILL BILL'
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY

by Mia T, 10.05.06

 

he timing of the Foley revelations is a bit odd. If the intended beneficiary of the political dirty trick was the Democrats, surely the perpetrators would have sprung it closer to Election Day. A month is an eternity in politics (irrespective of the fact that it is the pundit class' favorite hedge).

TEMPUS ACTUM

If not the Democrats then who? Who benefits from the odd timing? And who has the means, the motive, the opportunity--and the m.o.-- ^{1, 2} to pull off this dirty trick?

WHO BENEFITS?

The clintons had been hemorrhaging ever since the first week in September when the husband, by attempting to quash the ABC movie, "The Path to 9/11," managed to accomplish in mere days what his opponents failed for years to effectuate, namely, to focus the electorate simultaneously on the clinton jackboot ^{3, 4} and on the clinton failure to confront terrorism. ⁵

If the story had legs, continued clinton stupidity and arrogance made them sprint. And as if dispatching the tired clinton scold, the tired clinton spinners and the tired clinton playbook weren't enough to keep story on page one of The New York Times above the fold, clinton brought his tired clinton shtick to FoxNews Sunday.

'KILL BILL'

What the country finally learned--fittingly on the fifth anniversary of 9/11--was that clinton didn't simply fail to kill bin Laden.

Clinton refused to kill or even capture bin Laden.

Clinton refused to kill or even capture bin Laden even as he pretended to go after bin Laden.

Clinton refused to kill or even capture bin Laden even as he pretended to go after bin Laden because killing or even capturing bin Laden would have denied clinton the Nobel Peace Prize and he couldn't let us know he valued the prize more than keeping this country safe. ^{6, 7}

VIRTUAL SURREALITY

A virtual kill of bin Laden seems apt. One should never expect more of bill clinton. And there is a certain symmetry, a perfect parry for clinton's 'virtual obsession.' ⁹

Hypocrisy abounds in this Age of clinton, a Postmodern Oz rife with constitutional deconstruction and semantic subversion, a virtual surreality polymarked by presidential alleles peccantly misplaced or, in the case of Jefferson, posthumously misappropriated.

The Other Nixon
Mia T

With everyone beginning to understand the dynamics of the clinton failure to fight terrorism, ⁸ prospects appeared even bleaker for the quondam shoo-in and for her husband's legacy, to which said prospects are inextricably bound.

As long as the voters believe the clintons willfully failed to kill or even capture bin Laden--and worse, that they did so for reasons of self-aggrandizement--there can be no scenario in which they recapture the White House.

Hence, bill clinton's 'virtual kill' on Fox Sunday morning.

Although "kill him" must have polled really, really well, the interview didn't help the clintons; the story remained on page one... and the hemorrhaging continued...

That is, until the Foley scandal hit the fan....

VIRTUAL KILL
THE CHRIS WALLACE-BILL CLINTON INTERVIEW DECONSTRUCTED

by Mia T, 9.27.06

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer

"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession ² with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live

"You know... the job which we should have done ¹... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....

But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak.  And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... ⁶

So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' 

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... ¹

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright.  Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

The president seems to be able, the former president seems to be able to deny facts with impunity. Bin Laden is alive today because Mr. Clinton, Mr. Sandy Berger, and Mr. Richard Clarke refused to kill him. That's the bottom line. And every time he says what he said to Chris Wallace on Fox, he defames the CIA especially, and the men and women who risk their lives to give his administration repeated chances to kill bin Laden."

... [T]he fact of the matter is that the Bush Administration had one chance that they botched, and the Clinton Administration had eight to ten chances that they refused to try. At least at Tora Bora our forces were on the ground. We didn't push the point. But it's just, it's an incredible kind of situation for the American people over the weekend to hear their former president mislead them."

Michael Scheuer
CBS Terror Expert, Iraq War Critic
former CIA head for hunting Bin Laden
Monday CBS Early Show

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

READ MORE
WITH LINKS

FROM THE CLINTONS' TERRORISM FAILURE TO THE FOLEY HIT:
connecting the dots


HOUSE ETHICS COMMITTEE FINDINGS:
RAHM EMANUEL LIED [FOLEY A LIKELY CLINTON HIT JOB]


SEE RAHM DANCE
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY part 2


'KILL BILL'
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY part 1


KILL BILL: AN UNINTENDED APPRAISAL OF THE CLINTON YEARS?

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[Mia T]

Her statements almost 40 years ago are important only so far as her actions historically and today attempt to actualize those statements.

Ironically, how missus clinton 'managed' (and continues to manage) the thesis confirms the Stalinist manifesto implicit therein.

STALINIST RISING?
HILLARY CLINTON ABUSE OF POWER
(WHERE IS THE UNREDACTED BARRETT REPORT ANYWAY?)

 

[Mia T]

You're welcome, CaptainK :)

[fullchroma]

Lying, thieving, power-mad socialist bump.

[Mia T]

bump! ;)

[Mia T]

ping

[ntnychik]

Excellent post, Mia. Thanks for the ping.
Here's Barbara Olson's take on the thesis:
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38835fe34c9e.htm

[Mia T]

thanx for the link, ntnychik. :)

[Jim Noble]

Mia, there is not a word in English to describe your relationship to Hillary!

You are her campaign manager's antiparticle.

Your latest is fabulous!

[MHGinTN]

With the proof that the clinton's have total disregard for the law and an army of criminals who will do anything to cover up, create lies, and fabricate false images for them (read criminals like Sandy Burglar and a media sycophancy with zero regard for the nation's founding principles), I will not accept that the exhibited thesis is in fact the original document this socialist pig rodhamster actually wrote in 1969. How rpomptly did this 'journalist' release this story on the commie network as he was instructed to do for the timing factor? And the public will direct their attention just where they are instructed to do so.

[Mia T]

Thank you so much, Jim. :)
It was your probing of the thesis that focused my thinking.

[Mia T]

bump

[UCANSEE2]

FWIW, I appreciate your dedication to the HRC issue.

I look forward to each new offspring in your posts.

The work you must go through to compile, maintain, and generate new output deserves more respect than it has been getting lately.

The thesis. HRC would not have ordered it kept hidden, unless what was in it would be harmful to her career. The only way it would get released would be if it had been laundered first by a virtuoso team of analysts and consultants.

The reason it is even being revealed is because she has spies that monitor FR and that is one of the issues that has been brought up that were a threat to her.
So, to defuse that threat, they laundered, then manufactured the release through a third party. Then it looks like someone found the goods, but no gold at the end of the rainbow.
Those who critiqued what they imagined was in it, are suppose to be made to look like fools, to the public.

As you are well aware, we are dealing with a feminist lesbian socialist who did whatever it took to reel in Bill and keep him. This included tolerating and covering for his affairs, to keep his career going so she could use it in the future. She gave in and did things that a feminist lesbian would find intolerable in order to support her long term goal, so her mind is cemented to the principle that she now deserves to be the most powerful leader in the world, power being the key word.

[Mia T]

Is there a nexus between 'China snow fringe tree" and
the clintons' snowing the fringe kook leftist media about Charlie Trie?

[MHGinTN]

Here is what Barbara Olsen in Hell To Pay said about the thesis when she read her copy of the original:

“But nowhere in her thesis — or in her later life — does she seem to recognize the classical liberal critique that the relentless pursuit of power is antithetical to democracy.“

But the journalist, Dedman, states an opposite conclusion, a more favorable, foresighted Hillary, even quoting from the exhibited document, hinting perhaps that this exhibited document is a rewrite which weaves solutions to critiques into a rewrite (and that’s why it is longer than the original 75 pages) in order to make the Rodham rodent more attractive and brilliant in foresight … when in actuality hindsight and strategic rewrite addressing decades of critique aims to create a new image for Hillary. But for all the creative lies and fabrications and substitutions, she remains the power crazed socialist she was in 1969.

From Dedman’s article:

In the end, she judged that Alinsky's “power/conflict model is rendered inapplicable by existing social conflicts” — overriding national issues such as racial tension and segregation. Alinsky had no success in forming an effective national movement, she said, referring dismissively to “the anachronistic nature of small autonomous conflict.” … Putting Alinsky's Rochester symphony threat (the fart-in) into academic language, Rodham found that the conflict approach to power is limited. “Alinsky's conclusion that the ‘ventilation’ of hostilities is healthy in certain situations is valid, but across-the-board ‘social catharsis’ cannot be prescribed,” she wrote.

Dedman goes on to write of this miraculous exhibit:

“In spite of his being featured in the Sunday New York Times," she wrote of Alinsky, "and living a comfortable, expenses-paid life, he considers himself a revolutionary. In a very important way he is. If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be social revolution. Ironically, this is not a disjunctive projection if considered in the tradition of Western democratic theory. In the first chapter it was pointed out that Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent of a dangerous socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared — just as Eugene Debs or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths — democracy.”

Folks, this sanitized, updated, transformed, then exhibited Thesis doesn’t sound at all like the same Thesis Barbara Olsen read for her writing of Hell To Pay. I do extensive research for writing books. I understand the process of digging and assimilating, then synthesis and exposition. I trust our precious BKO to have synthesized the truth of Hillary Rodent-rodham over this Clinton servant posting at MSNBC.

Does the following Dedman opine sound like honesty, or sycophancy? …

That doesn't mean, said the professor of political science (Alan H. Schschter of Wellesley College), that we won't see an Alinsky-Clinton attack ad. One can envision black-and-white photos of Hillary Clinton and Saul Alinsky, wearing remarkably similar Coke-bottle glasses, while the words scroll by: "radical ... socialist? ... exceptional charm ... sealed in the archives." … But at its heart, her mentor (Schechter) says, the Alinsky-socialist-Rodham connection is a falsehood. "My conclusion, she was already thinking in terms of practical politics, what works, what doesn't, more than on ideology," Schechter said. "She wouldn't have paid any attention to whether Alinsky was a Marxist.”

[Mia T]

Exactly. She is always trying to marginalize her opponents. As I wrote elsewhere recently:

FAKE OUT  

If functional assassination is a clinton sucker punch, the reputation for assassination-in-fact is the clinton coup de grâce.

To make sure their repulation always precedes them, the clintons never miss an opportunity to spread the rumors around themselves. By repeating every allegation of clinton murder and mayhem—while affecting an incredulous air, of course—the clintons intimidate and silence their critics even as they marginalize the enemy.

The outrageousness of the clintons' crimes, actual and apparent, will always work to the clintons' advantage, making the disabling of these flagrant psychopaths all the more challenging.

But disable them we must.

For the children.

STALINIST RISING?
HILLARY CLINTON ABUSE OF POWER
(WHERE IS THE UNREDACTED BARRETT REPORT ANYWAY?)

 

[MHGinTN]

ping

[Mia T]

Excellent. Thank you.

[Miss Didi]

Ah, looks like the old "release it yourself on a Friday so it's old news and blame the VRWC" strategy. Spot on analysis, Mia.

The Bubbas are simply going to have to find a new play book; we know this one by heart.

[Mia T]

If we can prove page disparity, we impeach both the latest version of the thesis and the latest version of this strange and dangerous... uh ... woman.

Where do you get the original page count?

Let's get on this one.

A cross-examination of that useful-idiot professor Schechter would be productive, it seems....

[Mia T]

You were onto it early, Miss D. ;)