[Pukin Dog]

No kidding. And don't you think it will BECOME known, when Ann Responds to all the nuts attacking her, but did NOT attack John Edwards? Or how about those who decided to excuse Tim Hardaway when he made HIS comments(where the rehab part came from for those of you still needed clues).

Ann has brought the issue front and center, and now we will get to sit back and watch the media do their attacks on her, and then Ann (and hopefully some of YOU when you wake up) can ask why there was none of this shock and anger at John Edwards for hiring people who said the same things and worse.

[paulat]

Sans Reproache

Non.

[NorCalRepub]

...there was tons of shock and anger at Edwards not firing those bloggers....in fact, enough pressure for them to quit. I understand intellectually what you are saying but that is just it, most people WON'T make the connection and just see Ann as crude and tactless......I'm not bashing your opinion at all, but the only thing I agree with Bill O'Reilly on is that excusing bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior is not an excuse....I actually believe Ann is super smart and quick on her feet but has poor judgment at times.....thus alot of one liners.....

[paulat]

why there was none of this shock and anger at John Edwards for hiring people who said the same things and worse

Because it was two little twinkie-girly potty-mouth bloggers...you twit!! Insignificant specks!!

Ann misread her audience...misread the Internet.

Hardaway, at least, is a relatively well-known figure who lost some serious endorsements in the aftermath.

Ann sucked the air out of CPAC for Hunter...and she wasted good-will on a third-rate candidate. For what??

Just to have folks twitter in the Beltway.