Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: '9/11' May Be The Only Answer Giuliani Needs
The Cable News Network ^ | POSTED: 8:28 p.m. EST, March 1, 2007 | Jeff Greenfield

Posted on 03/02/2007 11:57:07 AM PST by meg88

Rudy Giuliani is going before a big meeting of conservatives this weekend with a remarkable lead in the GOP race; according to a Washington Post poll, he's ahead of Sen. John McCain 44-21.

That raises a question: How could a pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control ex-mayor from New York be doing so well with Republicans?

The short answer is "September 11," but for reasons that go beyond the obvious, which is the sense that Giuliani rallied a stricken city, spoke in bold language about defeating the new enemy and actually was at risk in those moments.

But 9/11 did something else -- it elevated Giuliani far above the level of big-city mayor.

He was the official who "stood up to al Qaeda" and became a major American figure in the global battle against the enemy who'd so savagely attacked the United States. That made him much more than a big city mayor.

Moreover, the attacks radically changed the picture of New York -- the biggest Democratic city in the nation, and one not usually admired by core Republicans.

Two things have changed about New York. First, 9/11 made New York much more "American."

That's where the enemy attacked; that's where the president and the mayor stood with firefighters and American flag to promise payback.

The second factor -- and this is an argument Giuliani hasn't made much, but I'm guessing he will -- is that New York was where a Republican mayor, using conservative ideas on crime, taxes and welfare, turned around the city that was ground zero of modern liberalism.

For whatever reason, New York is much safer, cleaner, healthier city than it was a decade and a half ago, and Giuliani is likely to say, "I don't just talk about ideas like senators. I made them work."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: rudy; rudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: Antique Gal

and if we don't support rudy, we want the terrorists to win and kill everybody.


21 posted on 03/02/2007 12:09:29 PM PST by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! And watch Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Try to remember how Rudy won elections in heavily Democratic NYC, even without the boost that 9/11 gave him.


22 posted on 03/02/2007 12:09:38 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Registered; ElkGroveDan

I'll see your Grant and Klinton and raise a Karter. It took your guys two terms to do the damage (maybe less) that he did in one!


23 posted on 03/02/2007 12:09:42 PM PST by El Laton Caliente (NRA Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Registered

Truth hurts.


24 posted on 03/02/2007 12:10:16 PM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

The presidency is more than just crisis management, its as or more importantly about policy making. Does anyone know if Rudy ever supported raising taxes on anything ?


25 posted on 03/02/2007 12:11:52 PM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Registered
We're all waiting for how Halliburton will figure into your corruption theory.

That's a documented fact, Registered - that Rudy tried to steer that money to one of his own companies.

You sure have developed an allergic reaction to facts lately. You ought to see a doctor.

26 posted on 03/02/2007 12:12:09 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Registered

Documented facts but no links at all. Kinda makes you think doesn't it?


27 posted on 03/02/2007 12:13:00 PM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Our little jimmah gave him a good run for his money. I think history will shrink the little peanut farmer further into historical oblivion.


28 posted on 03/02/2007 12:13:25 PM PST by AdvisorB (FREE POOKIE!!! FRY MUMIA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
>>>>>While not quite in the Schwarzeneggerian "bulletproof" category, Rudy is still viewed as an American hero...

The liberals idiotic infatuation with pop culture icons A.Schwarzy and RudyG marches forward. LOL

29 posted on 03/02/2007 12:13:29 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Given your comments, your tagline is pretty absurd.


30 posted on 03/02/2007 12:13:39 PM PST by olderwiser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Giuliani may be able to rally the GOP to victory like he rallied NY after 9/11. I hope that if he is the chosen candidate he will select a solid conservative like Brownback or Hunter as a running mate. As we have seen with Dick Cheney, a principled and steadfast VP can push the conservative agenda almost as strongly (or even more so) than the president.

Let's face reality- the Dems have never been so motivated to win. We have to capture the center and the right in order to stop the Clinton machine. Giuliani and a true conservative running mate can do this. If not, get used to First Husband Bill hanging around the white house hitting on interns and orchestrating the media destruction of those who dare question his wife's left wing policies.
31 posted on 03/02/2007 12:16:25 PM PST by ParaVet93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

"...He was the official who "stood up to al Qaeda" and became a major American figure in the global battle against the enemy who'd so savagely attacked the United States..."

I'm having a major disconnect with the writer's logic.

If America wants a leader who "stood up to al queda" and is a "major American figure in the global war against the enemy"...that description would fit the president, would it not?

So why aren't the president's approval numbers above 50%? Why isn't he wildly popular with Americans?


32 posted on 03/02/2007 12:17:09 PM PST by sergeantdave (Carbon credit offset crabgrass - $20 per blade. Limit - 3000 blades. Hurry, supply limited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You asked for supporting links and information from me the other day. Provide yours on this subject. Thanks.


33 posted on 03/02/2007 12:17:37 PM PST by Registered (Politics is the art of the possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

I don't care who you support,answer my question.


34 posted on 03/02/2007 12:17:38 PM PST by Antique Gal (Antique Gal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
"2. The other candidates haven't really started exposing him in any debates or ads"

Same thing applies to every other candidate, especially Hitlery, who hasn't had even a single tough interview since she went to congress 6 years ago.
35 posted on 03/02/2007 12:17:55 PM PST by ShawTaylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
"2. The other candidates haven't really started exposing him in any debates or ads"

Same thing applies to every other candidate, especially Hitlery, who hasn't had even a single tough interview since she went to congress 6 years ago.
36 posted on 03/02/2007 12:18:18 PM PST by ShawTaylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

I think we don't really know how politically conservative Rudy is. He isn't a "social conservative" (read: advocate of using government to coerce people into living according to tenets of religions they don't believe in), which is a big plus in my book. Certainly his positions as NYC mayor on socialist redistribution schemes and guns are way to the left of what I find acceptable. But I also recognize that he couldn't have gone any further right on those issues and still gotten elected in NYC. Overall, he succeeded in pushing NYC significantly to the right. It's no accident that the city was prepared to vote in a billionaire businessman Republican to succeed him -- Bloomie wouldn't have stood a chance pre-Rudy. So he may well move further to the right when he's in an arena that can withstand that. I got the feeling he was uncomfortably squashed up against NYC's right-most wall throughout his entire tenure as mayor. It is urgently important to educate him on the 2A, though. I don't think he gets it, but more because he's never before had any reason to seriously examine the assumptions about guns that he grew up with, than because he's intrinsically in favor of a disarmed citizenry controlled by armed government agents.


37 posted on 03/02/2007 12:19:22 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Sorry, I meant to say, "That ain't how it works, Dirtboy, and you know better. Those who make the assertion have the responsibility to back it up"


38 posted on 03/02/2007 12:19:38 PM PST by Registered (Politics is the art of the possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: meg88

It seems it's the only one he has.


39 posted on 03/02/2007 12:20:12 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
"So why aren't the president's approval numbers above 50%? Why isn't he wildly popular with Americans?"

a. He was never hugely popular (post-9/11 excluded) because of his identification by the MSM with the 'eeeeevviiil religious Right' (which my lib cousin-in-law STILL complains about)

b. He screwed up in Iraq.

Any other questions?

40 posted on 03/02/2007 12:20:35 PM PST by Al Simmons (Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson