Now, there's one hell of a lopsided, sweeping statement.
What you just basically said if that principles are principles if they're only held by a minority, and that being in touch with the majority of the people he's looking to lead, makes a presidential candidate less than principled.
In other words, you believe that Presidential elections are won by not being in touch with a majority of the people who will be voting.
That's nuts.
Let's examine YOUR principles, shall we?
You used the words "killing babies" in your post...now, we both agree that abortion is wrong, and it's murder, and that abortionists kill babies by the millions every year.
What exactly have you done to stop this?
How many times have you physically walked into an abortion clinic and stopped a murder from happening?
Never, because that would be breaking the law itself. Gulliani is the law-and-order candidate so I'm surprised one of his supporters would suggest that type of action.
At the moment, I can do little more than discourage women from exercising their "constitutional right". We do that by talking about their unborn being human, about the immorality, about the options.
It won't help if we vote for a candidate who thinks they aren't doing anything wrong, that the baby isn't really human, and that abortion is the RIGHT answer to their "problem".