[CharlesWayneCT]

Never, because that would be breaking the law itself. Gulliani is the law-and-order candidate so I'm surprised one of his supporters would suggest that type of action.

At the moment, I can do little more than discourage women from exercising their "constitutional right". We do that by talking about their unborn being human, about the immorality, about the options.

It won't help if we vote for a candidate who thinks they aren't doing anything wrong, that the baby isn't really human, and that abortion is the RIGHT answer to their "problem".

[Luis Gonzalez]

"It won't help if we vote for a candidate who thinks they aren't doing anything wrong..."

You have a source for Rudy saying tghat having an abortion isn't "doing anything wrong?"

[Luis Gonzalez]

"Never, because that would be breaking the law itself. Gulliani is the law-and-order candidate so I'm surprised one of his supporters would suggest that type of action."

I did not advocate any such action, I am curious however...where is the President empowered by the Constitution to write or repeal laws, or overturn Supreme Court opinions?