Seems that the bureaucrats couldn't get the decimal points in the right place leading to a 10-fold exaggeration of global warming.
Can anyone confirm that the CSPP analysis is accurate?
1 posted on
03/02/2007 5:39:31 AM PST by
bjc
To: bjc
This reminds me of the case of the Iron content of Spinach! Popeye and my whole generation ate Spinach to get Iron because someone moved the decimal place to the left when the Agriculture Department printed the test results.
2 posted on
03/02/2007 5:46:38 AM PST by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: bjc; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
No, Really?
4 posted on
03/02/2007 5:50:47 AM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: bjc
They had the guy from Office Space calculate that for them.
5 posted on
03/02/2007 5:55:11 AM PST by
pas
To: bjc
Gore inaccurately said polar bears are drowning due to melting ice when in fact 11 of the 13 main groups in Canada are thriving, and polar bear populations have more than doubled since 1940
Less ice means less cover for seals, the polar bear's favorite food.
6 posted on
03/02/2007 6:05:43 AM PST by
wolfpat
(If you don't like the Patriot Act, you're really gonna hate Sharia Law.)
To: bjc
8 posted on
03/02/2007 6:29:50 AM PST by
phs3
(If you call a terrorist a freedom fighter, I call you the enemy.)
To: bjc
Why is the left NOW putting on a full court press with their Gloabal Warming Hype?
The only reason I can see is that they think they might be able to ram something through congress now that the Rats are in power.
9 posted on
03/02/2007 6:31:47 AM PST by
preacher
(A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
To: bjc
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson