Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: magellan; Yo-Yo; gridlock; Hydroshock; paul51; R.W.Ratikal; Jambe; Eric in the Ozarks; microgood; ..
But,...but,.....

....WEIGHT A MINUTE!!

I jes' l-o-o-ve posting this graphic from Randy's Journal!

24 posted on 03/01/2007 6:49:30 PM PST by skeptoid (BS, AE, AA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: skeptoid

LOL, yup, I've posted that a time or two myself. Airbust counters that the gross tonage may not be that much better than the 747-8F, but the number of containers it can carry is 50% more.

The A380F is built to carry volume, not weight, which only appeals to a few package shipping companies, such as FedEx and UPS. Airbust still claims a lifetime demand for 400 freighters, but I say they will maybe eventually revive the 10 for FedEx and 10 for UPS in another decade or so, but not much more.


38 posted on 03/02/2007 6:04:52 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: skeptoid

I think Randy compares apple with bananas.

The 787-8F can carry 140 t payload at a range of about 8.000 km. The A380F carry 150 t more than 10.000 km. Up to this range the 787-8F can only carry 110 t.

But what does FedEx, UPS or DHL needed most - mass or volume? The Airbus can handle 1.7 times more volume.


And no doubt for Randy on an Airbus containers are more than one and half times heavier than on a Boeing.


52 posted on 03/06/2007 2:45:09 AM PST by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson