Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spending and grade point averages are up, so why are the test scores down?
Goldwater Institute ^

Posted on 02/27/2007 8:30:38 AM PST by Reagan Fellow

The U.S. Department of Education released 12th grade NAEP scores last week and the results are discouraging.

Reading scores of 12th grade students have declined significantly since 1992. The percentage of high school seniors scoring “below basic” in reading increased from 20 to 27 percent between 1992 and 2005. During the same period, high school seniors scoring “proficient” in reading dropped 14 percent.

Separately, the Department released a study showing that since 1990, high school grade point averages are up across the country. Also, the percentage of students taking “college-prep” classes climbed from 40 to 68 percent. In addition, 12th graders in 2005 averaged 360 more hours of classroom instruction than their 1990 counterparts.

Despite all of that, the Class of 2005 performed worse on the NAEP than students in the early ‘90s. I’d like to remind you that Bill and Ted were students during that time…

Although the Department of Education did not mention it, inflation adjusted per pupil spending increased more than 20 percent between 1990 and 2002. It has increased even further since then.

As another famous Bill once said, it’s time for a change.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: education; govwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2007 8:30:41 AM PST by Reagan Fellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

MORE Money....equals....LESS results.....DUH.


2 posted on 02/27/2007 8:35:21 AM PST by goodnesswins (We need to cure Academentia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow
THEORY: The NAEP hasn't changed much since 1990. The grade-point average is based on local tests, and has suffered from the grade inflation caused by pressure to improve grade point average, or lose funding.

"If we don't raise our test scores, we lose money!"

"OK, let's ask easier questions - more people will pass - we'll keep our money!"

Of course, the excrement collides with the rotary air-mover when the kids reach the NAEP (or the real world), but the schools don't have a dog in that fight.

Just a theory.

3 posted on 02/27/2007 8:36:19 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

No wonder educators don't like tests.


4 posted on 02/27/2007 8:37:37 AM PST by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

MONEY


5 posted on 02/27/2007 8:38:58 AM PST by Leisler (REAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS WALK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

Related....

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2007/02/12th-grade-scores-gloomy.html


6 posted on 02/27/2007 8:42:02 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow
Why are test scores down?

Because money makes no difference and the grades are fraudulent.

7 posted on 02/27/2007 8:43:10 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Scores are down due to less teaching of basic skills! This youtube describes the deplorable condition of many math classes. http://youtube.com/watch?v=Tr1qee-bTZI&mode=related&search= Reading is no better. Where is the science?????
Extra money in my local school system goes toward hiring additional administrators or building a new school board building (beauracracy) - rather than directly benefiting the students or hiring additional/skilled teachers.
Educrats are the problem!


8 posted on 02/27/2007 9:04:08 AM PST by too much time (2+2= whatever you want, as long as you like yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

The kids don't have to read much anymore. Even in college courses little reading is required, not even in phlilosophy.


9 posted on 02/27/2007 9:06:30 AM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: too much time; BADROTOFINGER

WOW....I watched about 3 minutes.....I always wondered what the grandkids were doing when they were multiplying with some weird process!!! This is WA State where I am.....

ping to WA STATE Freepers


10 posted on 02/27/2007 9:12:30 AM PST by goodnesswins (We need to cure Academentia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

College courses don't require much reading???Which colleges. Source? I have a whole bookshelf of college books that have been read cover to cover, that will argue with that statement. I think you are making that up.


11 posted on 02/27/2007 9:18:59 AM PST by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

I am in Georgia. California backpedaled on "reform math" a few years ago and the Texas Public Policy Foundation wrote a poor review in the late 90's, but many other states use "reform math." We "afterschool" in the afternoons after public school. The kids love it - hah!


12 posted on 02/27/2007 9:22:40 AM PST by too much time (2+2= whatever you want, as long as you like yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

Hm. Test scores in the City of Chicago are up. I'd love to see a breakdown of where scores have gone up and where they've gone down. Correlations to race, ethnicity, family income, urban/rural, state, school district spending/pupil, etc. would be illuminating.


13 posted on 02/27/2007 9:24:29 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ga medic
College courses don't require much reading???Which colleges. Source? I have a whole bookshelf of college books that have been read cover to cover, that will argue with that statement. I think you are making that up.

Most of my students sell their books back to the bookstore as soon as the semester is over.

14 posted on 02/27/2007 9:25:09 AM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow
Spending and grade point averages are up, so why are the test scores down?

Because neither spending nor GPA bear any relation to test scores.
15 posted on 02/27/2007 9:26:29 AM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
MORE Money....equals....LESS results.....DUH.

Probably not a causative connection, though.

Educational fads such as the "whole language" approach and (sigh, again....) a lack of emphasis on phonics is probably more to blame for the decline in reading scores.

16 posted on 02/27/2007 9:29:08 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow
GPAs are up, Testing Scores down...

I'd say that's a good indication that standardized tests are worthless.
17 posted on 02/27/2007 9:29:33 AM PST by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets (and, yes, sometimes Jets) fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

My last university teaching assignment was in the College of Education, or "Center for Excellence" as it preferred to call itself, in the mid '90s. I was "disenfranchised" (not asked back) after too many students found my syllabus to be too difficult. Proudest moment of my life actually.

During the 1970s I was a young English teacher on the Navajo Reservation. Many of my students lived, literally, in mud huts. They did not speak English as a first language. Almost all lived in circumstances of real poverty.

Those kids, bless their hearts, had higher levels of literacy and writing skills than my spoiled, lazy white university students twenty years later.

I'm so glad to be out of educationalism.


18 posted on 02/27/2007 9:29:52 AM PST by NaughtiusMaximus ((Tagline under construction.) Watch this space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
No wonder educators don't like tests.

I don't like tests, either. Kids in my school district spend at least 20 days every year taking various mandatory tests.

And since there's monetary impact to the test scores, -- big, gasping surprise -- the schools have taken to teaching to the tests.

The current emphasis on "testing" is a crock, foisted on us by idiots who want to pretend they're doing something about education.

19 posted on 02/27/2007 9:32:19 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Fellow

My son graduated from high school in 2006. He's about the last group of the "whole language" nonsense. Second son will graduate in 2008, and everything had changed for him in first grade--back to phonics, for the most part.

I bet the test scores will start going back up.


20 posted on 02/27/2007 9:35:44 AM PST by jaybee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson