Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giuliani: Welfare Reform Bill Does More harm Than good
NYC Mayoral Archives ^ | 11-11-1996 | Rudy Giuliani

Posted on 02/27/2007 6:53:52 AM PST by TitansAFC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
---"There are aspects to the Welfare Reform Bill that, as just a matter of policy, I disagree with and I think could pose very serious problems, and although I do think the bill does some good, in the end I believe it does more harm than good.

But actually, what I would like to discuss, at least in terms of the remarks I prepared, is the area in which the Welfare Reform Bill raises serious constitutional questions."---

---"I believe this provision has a good chance of being overturned by the Court because it's unconstitutional, and I hope we prevail."---

1 posted on 02/27/2007 6:53:56 AM PST by TitansAFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Internationally recognized economic advisor M ichael Boskin, Hoover Institute:

Dr. Michael J. Boskin said, “I am volunteering to join Rudy’s team because, in a talented field of qualified candidates, Rudy Giuliani stands out for his rare blend of intelligence, highly successful experience, leadership and vision. His eight years as Mayor of New York have rightly been judged “the most successful episode of conservative governance in this country in the last fifty years”. He trimmed bureaucracy, controlled spending, repeatedly cut taxes, and radically reduced crime and welfare rolls. Not surprisingly, New York, which had been in a downward spiral of rampant crime and fiscal chaos, experienced a renaissance.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1791600/posts?page=1

Newt Gingrich:
"He is much stronger than anyone could have predicted six months ago," said former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich from Georgia. "New York is four times safer than it used to be. It's one of the greatest achievements of government capability (that's fiscal responsibility for the dimbulbs around here) in the 20th century. And Rudy just has to go out and say, 'This is who I am. If you think the world's dangerous, and you need a tough guy … that's me.' "

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1786270/posts



George Will:
As George Will said on “This Week,” “His eight years as mayor of New York were the most successful episode of conservative governance in this country in the last 50 years, on welfare and crime particularly." Giuliani, more than any other candidate (Romney comes the closest) has the record of taking on major institutions and reforming them.

Human Events Reporter:
The rebirth of New York City, the most visible urban achievement in the 20th century is the work of the person now dubbed America’s mayor. For the millions of Americans who live in New York and the millions more who work or whose livelihood has been affected by its revival the contrast between the pre and post Giuliani years could not be more striking.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1780064/posts

Bill Simon:

And when you talk about issues related to fiscal conservatism, which are important to Rudy, I don't know anybody in the public arena who has cut taxes 23 times as Rudy did when he was mayor of New York; who has shrunk the size of government, which he did when he was mayor of New York; reduced the welfare rolls by over 50 percent, which he did when he was mayor of New York. And that's not going into reducing crime by 65% and many other things that he did while mayor in a situation that, before he became mayor, was widely regarded as the second toughest job in American politics, and was widely regarded as an ungovernable situation.

I think he did an extraordinary job as Mayor of New York in a Democrat-controlled environment, and being able to function as a fiscal conservative in that Democrat-controlled environment is an amazing achievement.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1786368/posts



2 posted on 02/27/2007 6:55:15 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

welfare roles were cut, but welfare JOBS (the people employed in the welfare programs administration) stayed the same..

how is that?


3 posted on 02/27/2007 6:58:45 AM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I'm sorry. What, exactly, does this have to do with Rudy calling Welfare Reform Unconstitutional?


4 posted on 02/27/2007 6:59:15 AM PST by TitansAFC (Liberalism is social terrorism, and it's much closer to home. No to Rudy, under any circumstance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
This is a correct quotation:

The tenth amendment reads: "The power not delegated to the United States by the Constitution not prohibited by it to the States is reserved to the States respectively or to the people." So what the Constitution says is unless a power is given to the national government, to the federal government, and unless you define those powers in the enumerated powers of the federal government, those powers are retained for the states for their local subdivisions and for the people.

The correct way to undo abortion is precisely through the application of the Tenth Amendment; overturn Roe vs. Wade and make it subject to a series of state referenda, much like what happened with gay marriage.

Note: Rush Limbaugh also stated that this was the correct approach in "The Way Things Ought to Be". As Rudy appears to be keen on the Tenth Amendment - wonderful, this helps.

Ivan

5 posted on 02/27/2007 7:00:52 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Please respond to the article instead of canned spam which I and most other people don't even bother to read.

Oh, and please do not use your usual insult non-responses such as "you're on drugs," "you're drinking," "you're off your meds," etc. Very lame and so overdone by you when you can't debate a point, which is often.
6 posted on 02/27/2007 7:00:58 AM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Why is that man even running with a (R) behind his name?


7 posted on 02/27/2007 7:01:18 AM PST by El Laton Caliente (NRA Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

No matter what he called it, this is what he did:

Giuliani decided to launch a welfare revolution, moving recipients from the dole to a job. Mindful that for years the city’s welfare bureaucracy had focused on signing up new recipients (Lindsay’s welfare chief had been nicknamed “Come And Get It” Ginsberg), the Giuliani administration first set out to recertify everyone in the city’s own home-relief program to eliminate fraud. In less than a year, the rolls of the program (for able-bodied adults not eligible for federal welfare programs) declined by 20 percent, as the city discovered tens of thousands of recipients who were actually employed, living outside the city, or providing false Social Security numbers.

Giuliani then instituted a work requirement for the remaining home-relief recipients, mostly men, obliging them to earn their checks by cleaning city parks and streets or doing clerical work in municipal offices for 20 hours a week. Welfare advocates vigorously objected, and one advocate pronounced the workfare program “slavery.” The New York Times editorialized that most people on home relief were incapable of work.

Giuliani persisted, and when Congress finally passed welfare reform in 1996, giving states and cities broad powers to refocus the giant, federally funded welfare program for mothers and children, Giuliani applied many of the same kinds of reforms. He hired as welfare commissioner Jason Turner, the architect of welfare reform in Wisconsin, which had led the nation in putting welfare recipients back to work. Turner promptly converted the city’s grim welfare intake offices into cheerful and optimistic job centers, where counselors advised welfare recipients on how to write a resumé and provided them with skills assessment and a space they could use to look for work.

By 1999, the number of welfare recipients finding work had risen to more than 100,000 annually, and the welfare rolls had dropped by more than 600,000. It took steadfast courage to win those gains. “The pressure on Rudy during these years was enormous,” says Richard Schwartz, a Giuliani policy advisor. “The advocates and the press trained their sights on us, just waiting for something to go wrong in these workfare programs.”

As part of Giuliani’s quintessentially conservative belief that dysfunctional behavior, not our economic system, lay at the heart of intergenerational poverty, he also spoke out against illegitimacy and the rise of fatherless families. A child born out of wedlock, he observed in one speech, was three times more likely to wind up on welfare than a child from a two-parent family. “Seventy percent of long-term prisoners and 75 percent of adolescents charged with murder grew up without fathers,” Giuliani told the city. He insisted that the city and the nation had to reestablish the “responsibility that accompanies bringing a child into the world,” and to that end he required deadbeat fathers either to find a private-sector job or to work in the city’s workfare program as a way of contributing to their child’s upbringing. But he added that changing society’s attitude toward marriage was more important than anything government could do: “[I]f you wanted a social program that would really save these kids, . . . I guess the social program would be called fatherhood.”

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26604


8 posted on 02/27/2007 7:04:23 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente
Why is that man even running with a (R) behind his name?

In order to help him spell his first name. Thats all I can think of.

9 posted on 02/27/2007 7:04:33 AM PST by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peach

As I pointed out yesterday on another thread, these people (especially Boskin) may all be full of crap and are really just repeating the same stupid talking point. If they really believed so strongly in the success of Giuliani's administration, they would have made these statements years ago.


10 posted on 02/27/2007 7:04:54 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente
Why is that man even running with a (R) behind his name?

All the other liberals are doing it.

11 posted on 02/27/2007 7:05:06 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente

um..because he is a Republican....like it or not.


12 posted on 02/27/2007 7:05:39 AM PST by sofaman (Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peach

It's a provision that attempts to reverse an executive order that New York City has had in existence since 1988 which basically says that New York City will create a zone of protection for illegal and undocumented immigrants who are seeking the protection of the police or seeking medical services because they are sick or attempting to or actually putting their children in public schools so they can be educated.
-----
It is clear that Rudy has no regard for the immigration laws of this country, nor the will of the people when it comes to the presence, and supporting of, illegal aliens in this country. Certainly, he would NOT be a President that would finally close our borders to illegal entry, and would pander to the millions of tax-sucking, law-breaking illegals already here. He is a radical SOCIAL liberal.


13 posted on 02/27/2007 7:06:50 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente
Why is that man even running with a (R) behind his name?

Because he's counting on obedient party lapdogs to carry him through.
14 posted on 02/27/2007 7:06:53 AM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I seem to recall there was a brand of conservatism called "states rights conservatives", who thought the Federal Government was far exceeding its constitutional mandate. The weapon they brandished against this encroachment was the Tenth Amendment. This speech is evidence that Rudy has some commonalities with these people.

Let's move next to the heart of the speech - he pointed out how ineffective the Federal Government had been in deporting illegals. It's important to note that his policies are reaction to the Federal Government's inability to sort this problem.

Regards, Ivan

15 posted on 02/27/2007 7:07:03 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; All
- Rudy launched a welfare revolution, removing illegal recipients, cutting the rolls by 20% the first year alone and dropping the welfare rolls by 600,000 over the course of his plan.
NY POST
Mayor Giuliani Delivers Eighth And Final “State Of The City” Address
New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's Fiscal Record: 1993-2001 – Deroy Murdock – National Review

- Rudy launched a work requirement program for the remaining welfare recipients. the NY Times called it slavery.
Mayor Giuliani Delivers Eighth And Final “State Of The City” Address
NY Times
New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's Fiscal Record: 1993-2001 – Deroy Murdock – National Review

- Rudy constantly spoke out against illegitimacy and fatherless families. One of many things that Rudy said on the subject was the following: " If you wanted a social program that would really save these kids, . I guess the social program would be called fatherhood.
" Rudy Giuliani “State of the City” Address
Mayor Giuliani Delivers Eighth And Final “State Of The City” Address
New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's Fiscal Record: 1993-2001 – Deroy Murdock – National Review

16 posted on 02/27/2007 7:09:13 AM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Giuliani/Clinton/Dem vs. GOP Platform Comparison
Issue
Giuliani Clinton Dem Platform GOP Platform
Abortion on Demand Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Partial Birth Abortion SupportsOpposed NY ban Supports Supports Opposes
Roe v. Wade Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Taxpayer Funded Abortions Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Federal Marriage Amendment Opposes Opposes Opposes
Defined at state level
Supports
Gay Domestic Partnership/
Civil Unions
Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Openly Gay Military Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Defense of Marriage Act Opposes Opposes Opposes Supports
Amnesty for Illegal Aliens Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Special Path to Citizenship
for Illegal Aliens
Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Tough Penalties for
Employers of Illegal Aliens
Opposes Opposes Opposes Supports
Sanctuary Cities/
Ignoring Immigration Law
Supports Supports Supports Opposes
Protecting 2nd Amendment Opposes

Opposes Opposes
Supports bans
Supports
Confiscating Guns Supports
Confiscated
as mayor.
Even bragged.
Supports Supports
Supports bans
Opposes
'Assault' Weapons Ban Supports Supports Supports  
Frivolous Lawsuits
Against Gun Makers
Supports
Filed One
Himself
Supports   Opposes
Gun Registration/Licenses Supports Supports   Opposes
War in Afghanistan Supports Supports
Voted for it
Supports Supports
War in Iraq Supports Supports
Voted for it
Supports
Weak support
Supports
Patriot Act Supports Supports
Voted for it
2001 & 2006
Opposes Supports

17 posted on 02/27/2007 7:10:21 AM PST by B4Ranch (You're in America now. Here we speak English.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

You're right and this was widely discussed at our GOP meeting two months ago.


18 posted on 02/27/2007 7:11:39 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The last I heard, we are still spending the same money, but we are spending it on things like child care to support former welfare recipients and help them get on their feet. That requires more individualized attention than just sending them a little check every month.


19 posted on 02/27/2007 7:13:53 AM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Sound's like Rudy is a follower of paul madison.


20 posted on 02/27/2007 7:15:21 AM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson