Posted on 02/26/2007 10:09:00 AM PST by neverdem
Global warming is like evolution. Can't prove it to be factual but can add anything to it that you want in order to fit the agenda.
I blame the Sun.
Despite current inadequacies, climate models are still our best tools for forecasting global warming. Those tools just aren't sharp enough yet.
Excellent article. Our Al Gore Luddites will not accept it, though.
Yep, that's pretty much true.
palmer, did you ghostwrite this for Roy?
The Goracle has spoken - it's unanimous - all scientists agree - humans are destroying the Earth - dead by July - report to re-education center immediately.
|
Scanning the Gore-bat sites right now, but this scientist's reputation will almost certainly be smeared within the next 24 hours, alongside the usual posts about how Bush's cronies "illegally" marked-up climate reports, suppressed Jim Hansen from making political statements, and covered up administration links to Exxon Mobil.
There is something fascinating about how the loony left tries to tie everything to the petroleum industry.
A cautionary view from a government scientist? Heresy!! No funding for his research next year.
I've worked on a couple of computer simulation models and if just one key assumption is incorrect in the model (e.g., out of 50 such assumptions), then the results can easily be thrown off by 50-100%. I'm surprised by the level of certainty that some outstanding scientists express in their testimony to congress. I'd say that some of them are exagerrating the level of certainty in this research in an effort to scare the world into action. I would rather see them say that there's a lot of uncertainty in this research, but at the same time the potential consequences of global warming are also very severe. That's a more honest approach that should get more support from the public.
That's a good name for an alternative rock band: The Global-Warming Moderates
One question needed to be asked, is the increase in CO2 concentrations the cause of warming or a result of warming due to other changes (e.g. variation in sun's radiation output or other factors)?
The darlings of Hollywood and the leftards must always have a 'cause' in which to direct their energies to magnify their egos and show that they have a soul. The last time it was AIDS. Oh, the ribbons they sported and the concerts they had. Wasn't it great? But AIDS is more rampant than ever. That went out of fashion and now GLOBAL WARMING is more hip. Break out the 'blue ribbons' and let's have a few concerts with 'Riders on the Storm' as their theme song. I'm sure it will change all the weather patterns.
Good point, and increasing CO2 concentrations could be both a cause and a result of warming (or only a cause or a result). A while ago, one guy posted that as the oceans warm up the dissolved CO2 in the oceans forms gas bubbles that rise out of the ocean into the atmosphere. This would only be happening to a slight extent because of the very slight warming of the oceans observed recently. It's just like the fizz bubbling out of your soft drink as it warms up in your glass.
Even the UN study says that cow farts and termites are a far greater source of greenhouses gases that industrial sources.
So CO2 is up by 40%. Does that make it just over 1% of atmosphere or is it still sub 1%?
Still well under 1%.
It is also worth noting that the solar constant above the atmosphere is subject to both fluctuations and uncertainty in measurement that are within the margins of that required for the current claimed warming trend.
"CO2 concentrations - now running at 380 parts per million (ppm), up about 40 percent in the last century - are indeed one possible explanation for our current warmth." If memory serves, the concentration of 1000 parts per million is needed to raise the global climate temp by an entire one degree ... is that right? ... So if that's correct, and the natural global ocean circulator lowers ppm concentrations by 500 ppm with every ten feet of snow deposited in galciers on landmasses ... wow, that al goreghoul must be smarter than Einstein to have reached his 'conclusions'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.