Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bigelow shoots for the Moon (Interview: Plans for privately funded moon base)
Cosmic Log ^ | February 22, 2007 | Alan Boyle

Posted on 02/26/2007 5:01:49 AM PST by saganite

Even as Bigelow Aerospace gears up for launching its second prototype space station into orbit, the company has set its sights on something much, much bigger: a project to assemble full-blown space villages at a work site between Earth and the moon, then drop them to the lunar surface, ready for immediate move-in.

In an exclusive interview this week, Las Vegas billionaire Robert Bigelow confirmed that his company has been talking about the concept with NASA – and that the first earthly tests of the techniques involved would take place later this year. The scenario he sketched out would essentially make Bigelow a general contractor for the final frontier.

snip

Getting all that right is "Job One," Bigelow told me. But by 2012, the focus could start shifting from low Earth orbit, or LEO, farther out into space. One of the key places in Bigelow's plan is a point about 200,000 miles (323,000 kilometers) out from Earth in the moon's direction, where the pulls of terrestrial and lunar gravity balance each other.

Bigelow would turn that region of space, called L1, into a construction zone. Inflatable modules would be linked up with propulsion/power systems and support structures, and then the completed base would be lowered down to the moon's surface, all in one piece.

Once the moon base has been set down, dirt would be piled on top, using a technique that Bigelow plans to start testing later this year at his Las Vegas headquarters. The moon dirt, more technically known as regolith, would serve to shield the base's occupants from the harsh radiation hitting the lunar surface.

(Excerpt) Read more at cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: bigelow; moon; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2007 5:01:52 AM PST by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

ping


2 posted on 02/26/2007 5:02:24 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Bigelow would turn that region of space, called L1, into a construction zone. Inflatable modules

Good luck to him. Sounds more like 'to the moon Alice POW', to me.
3 posted on 02/26/2007 5:08:44 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

His plans are entirely logical and mirror ideas around since I was a kid reading science fiction. In fact, his plans are not so much science as advanced engineering projects.


4 posted on 02/26/2007 5:11:26 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I am one of the first people that you'll get to fall behind human advancement ideals. I remain skeptical on this plan due to lack of anything resembling performance however. I wish them luck, I read of the same lunar modules decades ago as well.
5 posted on 02/26/2007 5:16:50 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Bigelow has it's first module in orbit and it has far exceeded expectations. He licensed NASA research on these modules because NASA lost funding for the program so his work is a continuation of a NASA program and some of the NASA scientists and engineers followed the project over to Bigelow. His module has been such a success that he's in talks with the makers of the Atlas 5 rocket to develop a man rated version of that rocket. All together, this is a program that is taken very seriously and of all the privately funded space research going on now he is head and shoulders above the rest and that includes Branson and his space tourism business.


6 posted on 02/26/2007 5:27:50 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I wish the project luck. The ideal is correct. Do you think it's feasible with current booster technology though?
7 posted on 02/26/2007 5:33:49 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Absolutely it's feasible. Right now he's relying on Russian rockets and I'm holding my breath the April launch goes OK. He had a contract with one of the private launch vehicle developers in the US but they haven't gotten anything off the ground yet. He's already outgrown that though and the big boys like Lockheeed Martin and Boeing are taking him seriously.


8 posted on 02/26/2007 5:38:27 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
The problem isn't boosters. The problem is there is no economic reason to have a permanent manned moon base. At least not yet.

The near future of space travel is suborbital and low orbit.

9 posted on 02/26/2007 5:45:53 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The problem is and always has been boosters.


10 posted on 02/26/2007 5:47:17 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Tourism is a perfectly valid reason for a permanent moon base, and it's a reason that has been around for decades.

I'm sure it's as close to economic viability as any other potential motive.

11 posted on 02/26/2007 5:50:59 AM PST by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The problem isn't boosters. The problem is there is no economic reason to have a permanent manned moon base. At least not yet.

I disagree. Helium-3 is the most probably driving force behind this effort:
12 posted on 02/26/2007 6:03:10 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (Islam... if ya can't join 'em, beat 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

Helium 3 is worthless moon dust until someone produces a viable Nuclear Fusion prototype. That's been 20 years in the future for as long as I've been alive (quite a bit longer than 20 years)


13 posted on 02/26/2007 6:07:06 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Imagine this - Muslims stay on Earth and worship the moon god, while Americans actually move to the Moon!


14 posted on 02/26/2007 6:26:19 AM PST by ikka (The US Catholic Bishops' position on immigration is objectively anti-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Bigelow would turn that region of space, called L1, into a construction zone. Inflatable modules would be linked up with propulsion/power systems and support structures, and then the completed base would be lowered down to the moon's surface, all in one piece.

Screw the Moon. L1 should be the goal in and of itself. From L1, you can launch to anywhere in the solar system at essentially zero cost.

15 posted on 02/26/2007 7:44:33 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Check out Bussard's fusion research. From what little I know it looks like it works.
16 posted on 02/26/2007 8:25:46 AM PST by W. W. SMITH (Is there any right devoid of responsibility?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Capture a near earth asteroid using ion engines and park it in L1. Use it as an anchor point for an elevator. Put four more in the other points. L2 would be perfect for Hubble 2 with communications relayed through L4 or L5. Put five more rocks in geosynchronous orbit around Earth 72 degrees apart with the first above Chimborazo. Don't forget the Earth Sun L points. They also offer opportunities.


17 posted on 02/26/2007 8:27:42 AM PST by W. W. SMITH (Is there any right devoid of responsibility?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

I think L1 might be contested. It's a very valuable piece of real estate. Do you know how large that region is? Will it accomodate multiple widely spaced habitats?


18 posted on 02/26/2007 8:28:06 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: saganite

How big is his bank account?


19 posted on 02/26/2007 9:27:27 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

So . . . do you think they will pry loose the anti-grav craft for such?


20 posted on 02/26/2007 10:02:26 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson