Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today, Shah's Iran doesn't look so bad.
Morning Call ^ | 2/25/07 | Eli Schwartz

Posted on 02/25/2007 9:38:01 AM PST by freedom44

When making a radical change, good sense requires that you consider the alternative. In 1978, the coalition that overthrew the Shah of Iran consisted of the bazaar merchants who disliked the Shah's move to modernize the economy, including the merchandising sector; representatives of the Palestinian Liberation Organization who objected to Iran's recognition of Israel; the Tudeh, Iranian communist party; the Mujadin, composed of students following their fashionable new-left ideology and the misled intelligentsia; all these under the leadership of the Ayatollah Khomeini and his followers, fundamentalist Muslims who hated the Shah's regime for its tilt toward secularism, modernism, Westernization and America.

If these were his enemies, the Shah doesn't seem that bad. The severity of his regime pales by comparison to what followed. The revolutionaries held one-day secret mock trials, followed by next-day executions. Government officials and army officers went first, followed in short order by the Tudeh. Next came the suppression of the Bahai and the Zorastorians.

Of course, a large part of the Khomeini supporters, the majority of the students and the intellectuals, never expected such a violent purge. The Ayatollah had deceived them.

Of the many factors that eventually make for a better life, the Shah's record was quite good. Economic growth is always spotty, leaving some people behind. Nevertheless, the growth in Iranian per capita real income averaged around 6 percent a year over the 25 years of his government. It reached a peak of $6,700 in 1976, $6,400 in 1977, and fell to $5,400 in 1978, the year of the revolution. It averaged well below this level in all the years that followed. Now, with oil prices at a high 30 years later, it has reached the 1976 level.

(Excerpt) Read more at mcall.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iran; khomeini; regime; shah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2007 9:38:03 AM PST by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedom44
I've been saying this for years. I remember the media coverage of Iran in the mid 1970's. The Shah was evil! His secret police, SAVAK, tortured and killed people! It was a beastly regime!

So, when the revolution came, Jimmy Carter sniffed and turned his back on the Shah. And that's how Islamic Fundamentalists got a real foothold in the Middle East -- and learned that taking Americans hostages is no big deal, with no real consequences.

Of course, once Khomeini was in power and the full repression of his Islamic theocracy began to be apparent, the media's attention drifted to Nicaragua where another US-backed political group was being ... Brutal! People were being tortured! ... and I seem to remember Jimmy Carter helping our enemies down there as well (as an ex-President).

2 posted on 02/25/2007 9:51:35 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Ah the memories... Madison Wisconsin 1978/79. Crowds parading around the capital square chanting "Hey Hey, Hey Ho, the Shah has got to go!"
3 posted on 02/25/2007 9:51:38 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

And of course, don't forget Jimmah Carter...and his great support for the Shah....


4 posted on 02/25/2007 9:52:08 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Big BUMP


5 posted on 02/25/2007 9:52:25 AM PST by nuconvert ([there are bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
I also recall quite a few Americans supported the overthrow of the Shah. None of the leaders of the women's movement supported him. In fact one leading feminist, Kate Millet, I believe, was in Tehran cheering when Khomeini arrived from Paris. The Shah was far from perfect but under his rule women held positions in the judiciary and elsewhere. They were removed after Khomeini came to power.
Perhaps, left wing femi-nazis supported Khomeini and his gang because they hated America.
6 posted on 02/25/2007 9:53:29 AM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Credit to the Peanut Farmer for the past and current fiasco.


7 posted on 02/25/2007 9:53:40 AM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Both Pahlevi Shahs were the right men at the right time. Reza Pahlevi (1925-41) catapulted Iran from the medieval Islamic world into the 20th century and fought Sharia and the Islamic Clergy at every turn. His son directed Iran on a western, pro-American way. He was an ally of Israel and in his own words the only stronghold in the Middle East against Communism and Islamism.

Thank you Jimmy Carter for betraying him in favour of the Ayatollah!


8 posted on 02/25/2007 9:55:33 AM PST by SolidWood (Attack Iran NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Yeah, the Ayatollah put a few SAVAK agents in jail and just issued new uniforms to the rest of them and turned them loose again on the population. The Shah wasn't perfect but he was the only friend we had in the region besides Israel. Jimmy Carter did more damage to the U.S. and our allies than any president in history.


9 posted on 02/25/2007 10:09:27 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"Of course, a large part of the Khomeini supporters, the majority of the students and the intellectuals, never expected such a violent purge. The Ayatollah had deceived them."

Sounds like most revolutions, including France and Russia.

Wonder what historians will say about the US after 2008?

10 posted on 02/25/2007 10:13:01 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
I was a student at Cal State Long Beach at the time. There were a lot of Iranian students there. I remembering thinking at the time that all the anti Shah posters around campus seemed just a bit too coordinated. Too many vibes from the same anti Vietnam crowd that had worked its magic a few years before.
11 posted on 02/25/2007 10:21:38 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

If there is to be a vote for the ONE person who put the world into the mess in Iran/Iraq that we have today, I nominate:

Jimmy Carter
Hands down still the worst president we have ever had, with Bill Clinton trying to take over that status.


12 posted on 02/25/2007 10:22:37 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Jimmah what a cheap cowardly commie and a lying fool...if there is justice for this scumbag, he will hang from a lampost.


13 posted on 02/25/2007 10:41:15 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

I still feel bad for the troops that were sent on a mission seemingly designed to fail.I would not be surprised one bit if Crater knew it all along.No,I did not mis-spell Crater.


14 posted on 02/25/2007 10:46:42 AM PST by xarmydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

How in the world did a dirt poor cleric spend tens of millions on tapes and videos across Iran in the late 70's?? The entire revolution makes about as much sensed as martins from outer space.


15 posted on 02/25/2007 10:47:12 AM PST by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

I remember when the Shah was deposed. My father said it was a huge mistake. He's gone now, but Daddy was right.


16 posted on 02/25/2007 10:57:10 AM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
The magnitude of Carter's betrayal of the Shah is counted in the MILLIONS who died as a direct result of his handing one of the region's most powerful nations to Islamofascism (recall the Iran-Iraq war and you'll agree with the millions figure), not to mention the forming of a terror state that has sponsored the vast majority of Middle-East, and western murderous terrorist attacks in the past 30 years (and has cooperated with al Quaeda - to what extent is unclear as the answers are locked away in Tehran.

Jimmy Carter's policy has been a rolling catastrophe through the years. If he could get his mind off himself and contemplate the opportunity he blew and the results, old Jummuh would go out and hang himself in despair.

But then, its all been about him and his anti-American 'Nobel' policy....so that's not likely to happen...

17 posted on 02/25/2007 11:10:25 AM PST by Al Simmons (Thou Shalt Speak No Ill of Another Republican - Ronald Wilson Reagan's 11th Commandment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"Today, Shah's Iran doesn't look so bad."

I am hoping someday to hear the liberated women of Iran come to America and say a loud "thank you" - "NOT" to all the American feminists who stayed silent during the brutal regime of the mullahs.

18 posted on 02/25/2007 11:10:29 AM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

The Shah of Iran built on what his father had started, and what the Allies are trying to do now. A balance. Iran under the Shah had balance and the benefits of both modern society and an understanding of the requirements of Islam.

The SAVAK was much more about Islam than western mores.


19 posted on 02/25/2007 11:26:01 AM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
The growing Iranian middle and professional class should have supported the Shah, but they have told me, they were deceived by Khomeini. Sad. They neglected the ancient Hindu proverb, ''Do not ride to power on the back of the tiger.''
That was unfortunate.

The Shah's American ally under President Jimmy Carter was inconsistent and President Carter proved himself completely inept.
The author goes way to easy on Jimmy Carter, IMO.
20 posted on 02/25/2007 12:05:48 PM PST by ChessExpert (Reagan defeated the Soviet Union despite the Democratic party. We could use another miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson