Skip to comments.
Using free wireless at library described as theft
Anchorage Daily News ^
| 2/24/07
| ANDREW WELLNER
Posted on 02/24/2007 6:58:29 PM PST by conservative in nyc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-126 next last
Strange. I can understand why driving down the street and piggybacking on your neighbor's unsecured wireless network could arguably be illegal. It was after hours, but isn't the public library's system wireless Internet system meant to be used by the public?
To: conservative in nyc
Seems like the police went a little overboard here.
To: conservative in nyc
While traveling, I've stopped by motels that advertise wireless internet and spent a few minutes checking email and Free Republic's latest threads.
3
posted on
02/24/2007 7:03:36 PM PST
by
CedarDave
(Vietnam Vet Remembers -- This Time ... SUPPORT the Troops, COMPLETE the Mission)
To: conservative in nyc
Don't we all pay taxes so the libraries can have internet services? And a network at a public library...doesn't seem like theft to me. Sounds like somebody wants to make a big deal out of this. Dorks.
4
posted on
02/24/2007 7:04:51 PM PST
by
blu
(All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
To: conservative in nyc
Simple issue. Is the public allowed to use the library's wireless internet or not?
5
posted on
02/24/2007 7:05:10 PM PST
by
billybudd
To: conservative in nyc
6
posted on
02/24/2007 7:05:36 PM PST
by
sarasmom
( War is not the most vile of the evils humanity commits . There is always apathy...)
To: conservative in nyc
Aren't home networks password protected, or are many too lazy or technically challenged to use a password.
7
posted on
02/24/2007 7:07:43 PM PST
by
CedarDave
(Vietnam Vet Remembers -- This Time ... SUPPORT the Troops, COMPLETE the Mission)
To: conservative in nyc
He should give back what he stole.
8
posted on
02/24/2007 7:08:01 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: conservative in nyc
Considering that the bandwidth is from public dollars it isn't unreasonable that anyone within that wireless hotspot be able to use it. The cops may have been a little overzealous.
However, illegal parking, loitering, or other public nuisance seems like a better approach if there is a violation of the local ordinances.
9
posted on
02/24/2007 7:08:14 PM PST
by
quantim
(Do not underestimate the evilness of the 'soccer mom.')
To: CedarDave
10
posted on
02/24/2007 7:08:14 PM PST
by
Cooter
To: conservative in nyc
I would like to know what law was broken. Does this mean that scanners are illegal?
To: conservative in nyc
It can't be construed as illegal.
To connect, your computer asks permission to connect. The router then indicates whether or not permission is granted.
Make sure the judge understands this.
12
posted on
02/24/2007 7:09:12 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: conservative in nyc
I guess there is no crime in Palmer, Alaska.
13
posted on
02/24/2007 7:09:43 PM PST
by
Alouette
(Learned Mother of Zion)
To: conservative in nyc
If they told him to go park in a public place.....If he can afford a Dell lap top, and a scanner he should be able to al least afford dial up.
14
posted on
02/24/2007 7:10:29 PM PST
by
CindyDawg
(Duncan Hunter Tagline in process)
To: taxesareforever
Scanners are explicitly prohibited in federal law from operating at cell phone frequencies. Scanners sold must block access to those frequencies.
15
posted on
02/24/2007 7:10:40 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: ClearCase_guy
If he pays a tax in the community which goes to fund the library, did he steal anything? or did he pay for it?
16
posted on
02/24/2007 7:11:09 PM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: conservative in nyc
but isn't the public library's system wireless Internet system meant to be used by the public?Depends on why he was using it instead of a connection that could be tied back to him.
"The police officer confiscated Tanner's laptop in order to inspect what he may have been downloading, Remaley said."
The case will probably go away if there isn't anything illicit on the machine.
17
posted on
02/24/2007 7:14:00 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: conservative in nyc
I didn't know using something's that's free is now viewed as a crime. I guess the cops have too much time on their hands to go after the real criminals.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
18
posted on
02/24/2007 7:14:25 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: billybudd
This whole issue is bunk.
I would compare it to a drive-in theater.
Tune your stereo to the right freq and sit out on the hill, free movie.
The providers of the wireless service could password protect this stuff if it was such a big deal.
To: conservative in nyc
It's not theft, it's unauthorized access...and I don't know why this kid surrendered his computer BEFORE the police had obtained a search warrant. Correct me if I got the facts wrong.
20
posted on
02/24/2007 7:15:28 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(Sic Semper Tyrannis * Allen for U.S. Senate in '08 * Duncan Hunter for President in '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson