Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thinking Hard About Voting For Rudy Guiliani
The Bulletin ^ | Feb. 22, 2007 | Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 02/23/2007 7:05:51 PM PST by FairOpinion

I've never voted for Rudy Giuliani in my life. But I'm thinking hard about it now.

In both cases, I surprise myself.

The rest of America may know Rudy as "America's Mayor" for his ceremonial performance post-9/11, but for New Yorkers who lived through the Dinkins years, Rudy Giuliani is more than a guy who stands tall when the skyscrapers fall. By the late '90s, people were beginning to say that New York City was ungovernable: Remember the court-driven interest group spending, the disorder, the bums taking over the parks and the playgrounds and the street corners, spiraling welfare costs, the crime, the small business disaster, the high taxes, rent control, the South Bronx? New York was a disaster area, a poster child for what liberalism hath wrought.

The glittering cosmopolitan New York City we now live in, the one seemingly every college student in America dreams about moving to, is largely Rudy's gift, forged in the face of intense, daily, nasty invective from those who at the time insisted that to demand order and civility in a large city was to be a fascist.

Even Rudy's 9/11 performance tends to be misdescribed. It was not that he "stood tall" or didn't emotionally collapse. George Bush came to New York City and made graceful speeches about how we will rebuild the hole in the ground that still remains. What stood out for us in that dark time was not that the mayor of New York insisted we would triumph over this adversity, but that he didn't try to spin us about how unimaginably bad this sort of adversity was. He didn't try to soft-pedal the uncertainty, the chaos, the suffering the city was going through, and that gave us the confidence to believe that reality, terrible as it was, could in fact be faced.

I never voted for Rudy when I lived in New York City for one simple reason: abortion. I don't look for purity in politicians, just for some small pro-life reason to vote for a guy: Medicaid funding, parental notification, partial birth abortion. Throw me the slightest lifeline, otherwise I assume he just doesn't want the vote of people like me. Rudy never did. So I never gave him my vote. And of course it doesn't help now to recall the way Rudy treated his second wife, nor do I particularly want to imagine the third Mrs. Giuliani as Laura Bush's successor.

So I could have sworn, even a few months ago, that I'd never vote for Rudy Giuliani, in spite of my deep respect for his considerable achievements as mayor. So why would I even think of changing my mind? Two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.

When I ask myself, who of all the candidates in both parties do I most trust to keep me and my children safe? The answer is instantaneous, deeper than the level any particular policy debate can go: Rudy Giuliani. And when I look ahead on social issues like gay marriage, the greatest threat I see is that the Supreme Court with two or more appointments from Hillary Clinton, will decide that our Founding Fathers, in their wisdom, created a national constitutional right to whatever social liberals have decided is the latest civil rights battle. It's hard to see a state that George Bush won in which Rudy Giuliani will not beat Hillary Clinton. And he will put a whole slew of new blue states into play: Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, to name just three. (The latest Quinnipiac poll shows Giuliani in a dead heat with Clinton in Connecticut.) Which puts people like me, who care very deeply about marriage and life issues, in the position of thinking hard about Rudy.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortteamrudy; clinton; democratrudy; electionpresident; elections; fraudiani; giuliani; gungrabber; hillary; homosexualagenda; judges; judiciary; partysplitter; perverts; rudy; willtapdance4votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-454 next last
Food for thought...

Ask yourself: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

1 posted on 02/23/2007 7:05:54 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Rudy PING


2 posted on 02/23/2007 7:06:21 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Who is the REAL Rudy?

A sleaze bag who dropped a 14-year marriage with a BS annullment (second cousin), divorced a second while chasing another woman, and lived with 2 homos while the marital dust of number 2 settled...and then married again.

The funny thing, 2nd wife Donna Hanover thought she was getting the heave-ho because of Rudy's well-known relationship with yet another woman, Cristyne Lategano, the mayor's former communications director.

This guy makes BJ Clinton look like an amateur horn dog.


3 posted on 02/23/2007 7:10:00 PM PST by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
By all means do not marry him!

"and lived with 2 homos" So no one who is friends with gay folks can be President? Gee I wonder why so many think we are bigots?
4 posted on 02/23/2007 7:12:21 PM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

One of my thoughts is - Can I see Obama (who does not have any law enforcement background and never really led anythign) or Hillary as Commander In Chief?

No.

Supporting Rudy G is easy for me.


5 posted on 02/23/2007 7:12:39 PM PST by merry10 (http://joinrudy2008.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

I guess if you are not a true blue conservative, the rules say that you need to not even talk to or befriend any gay people. In fact, if you have one in your family - don't tell ANYBODY!


6 posted on 02/23/2007 7:13:53 PM PST by merry10 (http://joinrudy2008.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Tell Arnie thanks for his opinion.


7 posted on 02/23/2007 7:14:01 PM PST by EternalVigilance (“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: merry10
The author hits on the KEY and really ONLY important considerations:

Two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.

8 posted on 02/23/2007 7:15:01 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

LOL. So many posts these days are just fitting right in with the media's stereotype of Republicans that I've begun to wonder if the Washington Post is signed up here.


9 posted on 02/23/2007 7:15:18 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I have another 'ask yourself' moment:

If Rudy Giuliani were running for the DEMOCRATIC nomination for President, would you cross party lines and vote for him?


10 posted on 02/23/2007 7:15:29 PM PST by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

RINO excuses.


11 posted on 02/23/2007 7:15:41 PM PST by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Rudy is not to be trusted assigning judges to the SCOTUS. I much prefer the guy who said this:

"If a judicial nominee can look at a sonogram, the picture of an unborn child, and not see a valuable human life, I'm not going to give him an appointment to the court. I am going to give him an appointment to an optometrist to get a set of eyeglasses."







"How can I help?"

Get informed: Duncan Hunter on the Issues

Sign up: Freepmail me to join the Duncan Hunter Pinglist

Or Freepmail seanmerc to join the Veterans for Hunter Pinglist

Put your money where your values are: Contribute to Duncan Hunter's Presidential Campaign

Help spread the word: Purchase "Hunter for President" items. Proceeds go to the Hunter campaign.
12 posted on 02/23/2007 7:18:03 PM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Vote for a liberal and you get liberalism.


13 posted on 02/23/2007 7:18:37 PM PST by SIDENET (Voting for a liberal doesn't advance Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

"If Rudy Giuliani were running for the DEMOCRATIC nomination for President, would you cross party lines and vote for him? "


It all depends on WHO would be running against him.

And election is NOT between some imaginary people vs. real ones, it's between TWO (READ AGAIN: TWO) candidates and you MUST choose between them, or you are voting for the worst one.

So again: you have the choice Hillary vs. Rudy. Are you going to be a "conservative for Hillary" or get out and vote for the Republican candidate, who, at the moment appears to very likely be Rudy.


14 posted on 02/23/2007 7:19:00 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I know you're answering it of Fair Opinion.

I called Lieberman's office when Algore endorsed Howard Dean. Even though I am a Bush supporter, I still would have liked to have seen Joe Lieberman with the nomination, because if Bush lost to him, then maybe we'd still be okay because he understands the stakes.

Security is the number one issue with me.


15 posted on 02/23/2007 7:19:27 PM PST by merry10 (http://joinrudy2008.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The author hits on the KEY and really ONLY important considerations: two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.

OK, what are Rudy's national security credentials beyond his performance on 9/11?

And there is no guarantee that Hillary is going to get the nomination, that whole 'Hillary's Supreme Court Appointments gambit is nothing but a straw man argument.
16 posted on 02/23/2007 7:20:01 PM PST by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
By the late '90s, people were beginning to say that New York City was ungovernable:

The damn Rudy boosters are getting so sloppy that they can't even get their dates right.

17 posted on 02/23/2007 7:20:03 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And here are a few scenes from next weeks show................


18 posted on 02/23/2007 7:20:30 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Yes, Hunter has real momentum, he went from 1% to 2% in the polls, where the margin of error is 2.5% -- a real winner and a strong candidate against Hillary. (/SARCASM)


19 posted on 02/23/2007 7:20:57 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

B T T T


20 posted on 02/23/2007 7:21:28 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson