Posted on 02/23/2007 2:58:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Sorry, even THAT is a confusion to me.
It is still early for the elections for both the Democrats and Republicans. Most people aren't interested now.
The media is paying too much attention to Rudy, so we know that is not good.
This is an 'address', a URL link.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/my/comments
Can you copy the one at the top of your page and post it into a 'post box'? If you can then you are capable of posting links.
Good night...................
Accusing trussell of stalking falsely like you are doing will not bode well for your membership status here, i PROMISE!
Awe...how cute. Is that the best you've got?
A reply to a post in large font could hardly be called "stalking". Why else would you post in such large font unless you wanted to call attention to yourself?
sure we were! everyone was welcome, so long as they could let thier hair down and live a little. try it, you might like it :-)
It would not had mattered if that person had been backing Rudy,the comments made were uncalled for,added nothing to a discussion and appeared to be nothing more than an attempt to start a flame war.
I am not a supporter at this time.
What's up with all the rest of your misspellings?
last I checked, Virginia and South Carolina were in the South.
The debate is supposed to be from New Hampshire and be nationally televised on CNN(hopefully Fox News or some other outlet will air it but CNN is what I've read). It's supposed to take place in April. That is a great opportunity for Hunter.
I didn't find this forum until I signed up in '01. I signed up the first day I found FR. And I tell you I first came to the attention of politics with GHW Bush and noticed how wicked the Demonrats were with their politics. I was an ardent supporter of Bush 41 throughout the fight against Buchanan(can't you tell by my name I admired Bush and his family?) even though I wasn't a registered Republican at that time(in fact I wasn't allowed to vote until '96). I was registered independent. And I supported W in 2000 over McCain and Keyes. Like I said, Keyes and Buchanan could be outrageous and oftentimes were but you have NO CASE in comparing Hunter to them.
There was foundation, as there is foundation for your perception of being dim.
Your post at 645 in this thread:
"Don't you just love how the rules changed on FR?
There was a time when spam was deleted and abusers were banned. Spamorama seems to be the new fad around here and makes reading posts a nuisance.
There was also a time when pictures of partial birth abortion weren't permitted, but now a decision has been made to permit those pictures because Jim doesn't like Rudy.
Of course, this is the same site that largely supported Alan Keyes (and was it Pat Buchanan) in 2000, so it's hardly representative of the voting public. Thank goodness!"
You refer to Buchanan and Keyes and it's apparent you fall into that category that finds some conservatives 'extremists'. Seems as if you are trying to make out this poll FR put up as pushing the 'extremist' point of view and not tolerant of Rudy. It's apparent with that post and that is what I was responding to. I just prefer a strong conservative candidate like Hunter and I wasn't a Keyes or Buchanan supporter.
I agree. The dude's concern was that it would be the same set of supporters. I support Duncan Hunter regardless of these suspected supporters. The dude is right to be concerned, as some of these extreme voices are truly unenlightened and embarrassing and, ultimately, counter-productive. Duncan Hunter needs positive support to win, not negative counter-production, which is what that set of stooges gives us.
You must be feeling pretty good for a newbie. You suck up to the boss regularly, you try and play hall monitor with who's on the $hit list, you're sanctimonious in your condemnation of other's nastiness and you're hypocritical about with its employment. Fits perfectly into the profile of a agent provocateur establishing himself as a fifth columnist to do the most damage on the home front.
Bothers you doesn't it? Bwahahaha
You can tell when someone is getting their ass kicked in a debate when they can no longer defend their position and have to resort to attacks on an occasional miss spelled word.
Both of which were a joke, and required by the way, that somebody else be drafted onto active duty to meet that draft board's threshold.
Laughable isn't it...and to think somebody else was drafted onto active duty because of the.
BUMP for Duncan Hunter!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.