Skip to comments.
Is White House spokesman the 'most useless' one ever?
Houston Chronicle ^
| February 23, 2007
| Julie Mason
Posted on 02/23/2007 10:31:08 AM PST by Dog Gone
WASHINGTON White House spokesman Tony Snow made a startling claim earlier this month, one that shed some light on changing perceptions about the job he's doing.
During a briefing, Snow responded to a question about climate change by noting that, "We're talking about nuclear development, which is now championed by, among others, Greenpeace."
Beg your pardon?
"I think there's some Greenpeace people who are certainly advocates of nuclear power," Snow said.
As whoppers go, that was a good one. Certainly, it was news to Greenpeace.
"Golly, you know, I can't believe the White House would get that wrong," said Jim Riccio, Greenpeace nuclear policy analyst. "Greenpeace was founded as an anti-nuclear organization, and we have been fighting nuclear weapons and their evil offspring, nuclear power, ever since."
White House reporters don't expect much from Snow, which goes part of the way toward explaining why his claim about Greenpeace went largely unremarked.
It's been less than a year since Snow started the job amid a clamor of hype including claims by Snow and others at the White House that he would be in the room for the heavy policy stuff, with a voice and a role to play.
The former Fox News personality quickly established himself as a glib and energetic adversary for the press, sometimes short on information but strong with a comeback. He learned everyone's name and all their peccadillos.
These days, whatever honeymoon goodwill he had has largely worn off and if Snow sticks around, he still has two years to go.
Reporters complain that Snow is frequently unprepared and that he personalizes encounters Snow recently told CNN's Ed Henry to "calm down" during an exchange over White House claims that the Iranian government was behind explosives seized in Iraq.
Most damningly, by Washington standards, many reporters covering the White House don't believe Snow has the inner-circle role or the access he was promised.
A latecomer to the administration, Snow is an outsider in a famously insular operation. He is not one of the Texans, like Dan Bartlett, counselor to the president, that Bush turns to in meetings.
For his part, Snow says that he is in the room when it's appropriate, and that his evasions and tap-dancing are sometimes intentional.
"There are going to be times when for various reasons national security, or sometimes even the propriety of dealing with other individuals in Washington and around the world you are, in fact, going to clam up for a little while until others have had their chance to speak," he said.
At a forum this week at the National Press Club featuring Snow and a group of White House correspondents, a New York Times reporter half-jokingly called Snow "the most useless press secretary ever."
Snow says he's not sweating it, and waves off suggestions that there is animosity on either side.
"What you see quite often at the briefings are sharp exchanges," he said. "It's not personal."
Either way, Snow has redefined the role of White House press secretary, probably forever. During last year's campaigns, Snow was in demand as a speaker at Republican events raising money for candidates and pushing the White House message.
He has also addressed Senate Republicans on Capitol Hill a task usually reserved for high-ranking administration officials. He said he loves the job.
"It's not only a privilege, it's a whole lot of fun," he said.
After the forum at the National Press Club, Snow stood on the edge of the stage, signing autographs for members of the public.
julie.mason@chron.com
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: demagogicparty; globalwarminghoax; greenpeace; greenspirit; makingitup; mediabias; memebuilding; msm; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; patrickmoore; tonysnow; waronerror; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: jimbo123
WOW!
If that was my workspace I'd be grouchy too.
To: Publius6961
I think it's "I'm Johnny Cash with earrings" day.
42
posted on
02/23/2007 11:16:29 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
WHOOPS! That's gonna hurt.
This is about as big a boo-boo as they come in journalism, lol! She wastes all those graphs trying to imply that Snow is clueless & in the process pulls a boner this big? Too funny - almost as good as it gets for the Houston Comical -and the suits upstairs keep scratching their heads trying to figure out why their national reputation is in the toilet.
Does the Houston Press still have that guy on the Chron's case documenting all their amateur-hour idiocy?
Great catch, Dog Gone.
43
posted on
02/23/2007 11:34:22 AM PST
by
leilani
To: leilani
Does the Houston Press still have that guy on the Chron's case documenting all their amateur-hour idiocy?It seems not to be a regular feature, but I see it occasionally.
44
posted on
02/23/2007 11:38:30 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
45
posted on
02/23/2007 11:43:15 AM PST
by
karnage
To: Dog Gone
The former Fox News personality quickly established himself as a glib and energetic adversary for the press, sometimes short on information but strong with a comeback. He learned everyone's name and all their peccadillos. Tony Snow must be doing something right.
To: Dog Gone
The most useless ever:
To: LiberationIT; Earthdweller; Gator113; top 2 toe red; A Citizen Reporter; kellynla; ...
48
posted on
02/23/2007 12:02:57 PM PST
by
dinasour
(Pajamahadeen, SnowFlake, and Eeevil Doer.)
To: BenLurkin
"If that was my workspace I'd be grouchy too." Yeah, she must be real important. Check out the 40 yr. old telephone hanging in her cube, the cord's so stretched out and shot she had to wrap it around to keep it off her desk.
He, he.
49
posted on
02/23/2007 12:05:21 PM PST
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: leilani
Wasn't it Rich Connelly who did the Chronwatch at the Press? I think I'm gonna drop him a line to make sure he's seen this.At the very least he'll probably get a kick out of it. :-)
50
posted on
02/23/2007 12:10:21 PM PST
by
leilani
To: Dog Gone
Bloopers of the century
Columbia Journalism Review, Jan/Feb 1999 by Leo, John
Blunders, hoaxes, goofs, flubs, boo-boos, screw-ups, fakes
The public seems to find TV and movie bloopers hilarious and endearing, but it's safe to say that no such enthusiasm is law ished on the gaffes of journalists. DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN, a victory that was confined to page one of a single edition of a certain Chicago paper, is always good for a traditional chuckle. But who knows or cares that UP (father of UPI) once announced that World War I was over when it wasn't, or that Time Warner's Pathfinder site managed to declare O.J. Simpson "Guilty!" on the day the jury turned out to have a somewhat different opinion?
Why is it that the movie Titanic could find no room in its 194 minutes of screen time to discuss the most famous headline ever published by the Baltimore Evening Sun? ALL TITANIC PASSENGERS ARE SAFE; TRANSFERRED IN LIFEBOATS AT SEA said the paper's page one head of April 15, 1912. And it's heartwarming to know that the famous headline is still giving assurance to Sun readers. Certain editors have been known to send the headline to people who complain that the paper doesn't carry enough positive news.
The Sun's famous mistake, repeated by the Los Angeles Express, had many authors - a White Star spokesman who kept explaining that the Titanic was unsinkable, radiomen who garbled emergency messages and the usual mix of reporters eager to beat the competition with news almost certain to be correct, since everybody already knew the ship couldn't possibly sink.
One confident but verb-free deck of the Sun's erroneous headline said TOW ING GREAT DISABLED LINER INTO HALIFAX. This phrase had some basis in realworld confusion: a message sent from ship to ship in Morse code confused Titanic with a no-name oil tanker, which in fact was being towed to Halifax because of engine trouble. A few frantic radio operators who came upon the message in the middle of transmission assumed the report referred to Titanic and passed the word on. The moral for modern days: assume nothing.
All journalists know that it's never enough to get it wrong. Those who do are expected to cluck over those who don't, so the New York Evening Sun ran a sidebar chiding The New York Times for publishing a ridiculous story that Titanic had sunk. The Wall Street Journal chimed in on a positive note, congratulating the builders of the ship for averting what might have been a serious accident. "The gravity of the damage to the Titanic is apparent, but the important point is that she did not sink," wrote the Journal. The reason for this marvel was that "her watertight bulkheads were really watertight."
Garbled accident reports are hardly the worst reportorial sins. The worst always involve getting it wrong on purpose. The name of Walter Duranty comes up quickly. Duranty covered the Soviet Union for The New York Times in the Stalin era. He is perhaps the only Pulitzer winner that The Paper of Record would fervently like to forget.
At first a critic of the Soviet Union, Duranty soon evolved into an enthusiastic supporter and state-of-the-art propagandist. One of his favorite comments was, "I put my money on Stalin." When friends asked about Stalin's tactics, Duranty liked to say "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs." Not that he noticed many broken eggs in Russia. When Stalin engineered massive famine in the Ukraine to help break resistance to Soviet control, Duranty told Times readers that "any report of a famine in Russia today is an exaggeration or malignant propaganda." In 1933, at the height of the famine, he wrote of abundant grain, plump babies, fat calves, and "village markets flowing with eggs, fruit, poultry, vegetables, milk, and butter at prices far lower than in Moscow." He added that "a child can see this is not famine but abundance."
In fact, the death toll was enormous and Duranty knew it. He told colleagues privately it was in the range of 10 million. British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge said Duranty was "the biggest liar of any journalist I ever met." But the Pulitzer committee praised Duranty's reports for their "scholarship, profundity, impartiality, sound judgment, and clarity." Four errors, arguably five, in a single phrase.
Eventually, Duranty's Soviet coverage provoked debate among his editors and readers. To its credit, the Times editorial page challenged his accounts. But in the genteel journalistic world of that era, his reporting was never odious enough to get him recalled or fired. The embarrassing Pulitzer has never been withdrawn or returned.
Fake stories live forever in journalism. Clifford Irving's "autobiography" of Howard Hughes was sold in 1971 to McGraw-Hill for $750,000 and Time-Life for $250,000. The Hughes hoax was either unusually bold or unusually stupid, since Hughes was still alive and therefore in a good position to notice that he hadn't written an autobiography.
The fake diaries of Adolf Hitler could not be challenged by the alleged author, dead for almost forty years. In 1983 The German magazine Stern acquired rights to sixty-two volumes of the diaries, purportedly pulled from the wreckage of a cargo plane nine days before Hitler's suicide in 1945. Stern described the miraculous discovery of the diaries as "the journalistic scoop of the post World War II period."
Watch Julie Mason find the best dirt..
51
posted on
02/23/2007 12:12:08 PM PST
by
OESY
To: Dog Gone
"The former Fox News personality quickly established himself as a glib and energetic adversary for the press, sometimes short on information but strong with a comeback"
This sneering weasel is merely writing the usual lib hit-piece. GLIB?? This negative word connotes superficial insincerity. Many/most MSM types are glib, but Tony Snow is highly ARTICULATE, not glib. He is most definitely sincere and honest, whether or not you happen to agree with what he is saying.
52
posted on
02/23/2007 12:13:46 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: leilani
53
posted on
02/23/2007 12:49:51 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
To Ms. Mason
HoustonChronicle.com>>> Have you ever heard of a man named Patrick Moore? He thinks nuclear power is good. He is a founding member of Greenpeace. What date will your retraction run?
From Ms. Mason
Thank you. Patrick Moore left Greenpeace in 1986. He now works for the nuclear power industry. Greenpeace is opposed to nuclear development.
54
posted on
02/23/2007 12:53:24 PM PST
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
To: OESY
55
posted on
02/23/2007 12:57:06 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Jalapeno
56
posted on
02/23/2007 12:58:41 PM PST
by
GoldwaterChick
(Never give in, never give in, never, never, never give in. Winston Churchill Oct. 29, 1941)
To: jimbo123
57
posted on
02/23/2007 1:26:22 PM PST
by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
To: Dog Gone
Heh. I just wrote an email to Julie Mason. This is her reply.
Subject: RE: In defense of Tony Snow...
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:04:38 -0600
From: "Mason, Julie"
Yes -- thank you. Mr. Moore does not work for Greenpeace and is not a member. He is a paid spokesman for the nuclear power industry. Greenpeace says it does not support nuclear development.
Julie Mason
White House Correspondent
Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau
202-263-6519
julie.mason@chron.com
Sent: Fri 2/23/2007 12:41 PM
To: Mason, Julie
Subject: In defense of Tony Snow...
http://www.nypost.com/seven/02232007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/nuclear__green_opedcolumnists_patrick_moore.htm
He was partially correct.
The co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore wrote an op-ed piece endorsing the use of nuclear power.
To: dinasour
I read this bilge this morning....I meant to ping you...but, I was so disgusted...I went to something else and forgot.
59
posted on
02/23/2007 1:39:22 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
To: Dog Gone
Any New York Slimes reporter should know the meaning of "useless" from personal experience. Many know the meaning of "treasonous" too.
60
posted on
02/23/2007 1:41:46 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(I am PRO-VICTORY!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson