[jrooney]

Victory is a stable democratic governement in the middle east where its citizens can go vote for its choice of elected leaders. We have elected leaders in this country that would side with terrorists over or own government, so your argument carries no weight.

As a former marine and damn proud of it, Ron Paul will never get my vote. Never. As you saw on the other thread you posted the other day for Ron Paul, there are many freepers that feel that way, and many that would have voted for him before his no vote on the surge. He will neve make it to higher office.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Victory is a stable democratic governement in the middle east where its citizens can go vote for its choice of elected leaders. We have elected leaders in this country that would side with terrorists over or own government, so your argument carries no weight.

So if the Iraqis had elected Osama bin Laden to power, that would be alright with you, because he was "elected democratically"?

The Shi'ite terrorists running the Iraqi Government have been implicated in the deaths of 241 United States Marines in Beirut. They no longer deserve one more dollar nor one more drop of American blood spent in their support.

"Democracies" which elect Terrorists to power are not worthy of our continued support. Period. Everything else you say is just spin to try to excuse your support for the terrorist-dominated Government of Iraq.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

Victory is a stable democratic governement in the middle east where its citizens can go vote for its choice of elected leaders.

FINALLY!!! a definition!!! A stupid lame, and shortsighted one, but at least we have a DISCERNIBLE GOAL. Better than anything I have seen out of the Bush camp yet.

Tell me, how many free elections do we give em till they elect the right people? We gave em one. How many more and how long do we stay till they do it the way we want them to?