[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Victory is a stable democratic governement in the middle east where its citizens can go vote for its choice of elected leaders. We have elected leaders in this country that would side with terrorists over or own government, so your argument carries no weight.

So if the Iraqis had elected Osama bin Laden to power, that would be alright with you, because he was "elected democratically"?

The Shi'ite terrorists running the Iraqi Government have been implicated in the deaths of 241 United States Marines in Beirut. They no longer deserve one more dollar nor one more drop of American blood spent in their support.

"Democracies" which elect Terrorists to power are not worthy of our continued support. Period. Everything else you say is just spin to try to excuse your support for the terrorist-dominated Government of Iraq.

[jrooney]

If we leave Iraq, AL Qaeda and Iran will take over there. Are you okay will a base of operations for Al Qaeda that had oil resources to pay for their attacks against our allies, our western interests, us and topple the other governments in the middle east, so they control all all the oil resources there? We would be forced to go back there in the future and fight a more formidable enemy with more financial resources. Have you thought of this? I doubt it. Your arguments are pathetic, just like your candidate. I hope he runs, so when he is beaten badly, you will see how little influence he and his followers have.

[jrooney]

Ron Paul has sided with the party of jackasses in the WOT, and the donks would like to see the NSA program of listening in on terrorists stopped, the kid glove handling of terrorists when interrogating them, giving terrorists access to our court system and rights under our consitution. That is what the donks want and Paul sided with them on his vote for the surge. I will never support the POS period. Everytime I am online and you do your little threads for Paul, I will post my points why he is not worthy.