[Reagan Man]

>>>>>Why is it important to you in misrepresenting, and lying about, Reagan in a futile attempt to rationalize the actions of Giuliani?

Okay, I see, he supports Rudy the liberal. I thought it was Romney the waffler. My mistake. LOL

>>>>Can't your boy stand on his own merits?

The answer to that question is, NO!

[George W. Bush]

Look, if you want to believe some little fairy tale based on a few tidbits that his biographer dropped in a book, go ahead. But it doesn't meet any evidenciary test.

Somehow, it is important for you to believe that Reagan was always pro-life even while signing a pro-infanticide abortion bill in 1968, one that was key to the Roe decision. And you believe that somehow he was utterly opposed to abortion from 1969 on but just didn't bother to tell anyone until 1975, two years after Roe. Nor did he attempt to correct his 1968 error while in office.

I'm not dishonoring his legacy at all just because I refuse to believe your little fairy tale version of his life. You probably believe that cherry tree tale about George Washington too.