Replies

Look, if you want to believe some little fairy tale based on a few tidbits that his biographer dropped in a book, go ahead. But it doesn't meet any evidenciary test.

Somehow, it is important for you to believe that Reagan was always pro-life even while signing a pro-infanticide abortion bill in 1968, one that was key to the Roe decision. And you believe that somehow he was utterly opposed to abortion from 1969 on but just didn't bother to tell anyone until 1975, two years after Roe. Nor did he attempt to correct his 1968 error while in office.

I'm not dishonoring his legacy at all just because I refuse to believe your little fairy tale version of his life. You probably believe that cherry tree tale about George Washington too.

Now I see what you're all about. You just don't like Reagan, and you definitely don't like people who defend his legacy and his honor.

This was no fairy tale explanation I offered. There is more legitimate evidence to support my side of this debate, then there is to support your exasperated efforts to undermine the Reagan's pro-life record.

FReeper jla told me you support Rudy the liberal to be the GOP nominee for 2008. No wonder your twisting and spinning your rhetroic in a futile attempt to make Giuliani look like something he is not.

Rudy Giuliani is NO Ronald Reagan. Never will be!