Replies

Why is it so important to you to pretend that he was an ardent pro-lifer even when he signed one of the earliest pro-abortion bills in a major state?

Why is it important to you in misrepresenting, and lying about, Reagan in a futile attempt to rationalize the actions of Giuliani? Can't your boy stand on his own merits?

>>>>>Why is it important to you in misrepresenting, and lying about, Reagan in a futile attempt to rationalize the actions of Giuliani?

Okay, I see, he supports Rudy the liberal. I thought it was Romney the waffler. My mistake. LOL

>>>>Can't your boy stand on his own merits?

The answer to that question is, NO!

Why is it important to you in misrepresenting, and lying about, Reagan in a futile attempt to rationalize the actions of Giuliani? Can't your boy stand on his own merits?

jla, we've been on threads together. You just didn't notice (in my longwinded posts) that I absolutely oppose Giuliani, both in the primary and the general. He is the one candidate I absolutely refuse to support. He is the enemy of the party of Reagan, as I've said many times. He will destroy the conservative GOP Reagan coalition utterly.

I could vote for McStain in the general if I had to, well, if he doesn't stab us in the more than he already has. I am looking hard at Romney, seeing some disturbing stuff but some signs also that he has had a change of heart in a pretty compelling way. Currently, I'm for Ron Paul or Duncan Hunter but not sure if in my late primary I'll get a chance to cast a vote for either. I'm thinking that if the primaries are moved up in NJ and CA, the only meaningful choice I might get is to cast a primary ballot for either McStain or Romney to stop the Evil Rudy.

And I am not misrepresenting Reagan. You are making claims that Reagan never made for himself personally. He became a pro-lifer in 1975 when he took his stand. At some point prior to that, he had already had a change of heart about abortion. But that was at some point after he signed the pivotal 1968 CA abortion bill.