[EternalVigilance]

Now, EV, there you go again. Romney and Guiliani are not the same on this issue. Guiliani is so pro-choice he is pro-partial birth abortion and is running for president as a pro-choicer. Romney has taken a conservative stand on the issue, and Jim Bopp chief attorney for National Right to Life since 1978, has joined Romney's presidential campaign.

Functionally, there is no difference. Both men's public policy positions have assured the continuance of abortion on demand.

Romney vociferously defends his pro-abortion stance

Oh, and Bopp? He's the pro-life movement's Benedict Arnold.

[Torie]

Mitt has rather drastically changed his public stand on abortion (heck he even has problems with embryonic stem cells now, unlike the LDS church), and Rudy is trimming a bit too. So while one can suggest, as I suggest, that these changes are ersatz in the sense that both men's positions are probably entirely political, and neither really care much about the issue, one way or the other, their public positions are changes, and to claim Mitt and Rudy are pro abortion on demand, is inaccurate as to their current public position. It just is.

[TAdams8591]

That video was five years ago EV and Romney has changed his views on abortion and now states a pro-life position.

What is your evidence James Bopp, current and chief attorney for National Right to Life since 1978, is a Benedict Arnold?