Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perspectives : The way to electoral suicide — vote Giuliani
One News Now ^ | Feb 20, 2007 | Matt Friedeman

Posted on 02/21/2007 12:06:36 PM PST by Reagan Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Ancesthntr
>>>>...anyone who says that they'll stay home or vote 3rd party if it is a Rudy-Hitlery race next November is, IMHO, sorely lacking in judgment.

Its always been my opinion that Americans are obligated to vote. Its our duty as citizens of the best nation on Earth and the greatest nation in history. However, not voting for Rudy Giuliani would not be a vote for Hillary Clinton. Not voting for Rudy in the general election would be a decision of individual choice, a matter of conscience, principle and integrity. Not voting for a liberal, is good judgment in my opinion.

Ronald Reagan was still a Democrat when he voted for Eisenhower in 52&56, and Nixon in 1960. That was also a matter of conscience, principle and integrity on Reagan's part. Reagan even left the Democratic Party after 30 years, because their politics had taken a wrong direction, moving away from what he believed in. Its no different today.

Personally, I think supporting, promoting and voting for a liberal like Rudy Giuliani, will undermine the Republican Party`s strength and fracture the GOP allowing a Democrat to win the White House.

81 posted on 02/21/2007 1:48:11 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I think Rudy would probably beat Hillary. But I'm not sure Hillary will get the nomination. And put Rudy against someone like Evan Bayh and he'd lose.


82 posted on 02/21/2007 1:52:05 PM PST by PFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

No, I'm not labelling Giuliani a moderate. My only point is that Rudy is to the right of Hillary and to the left of Reagan. This seems to me to be true.


83 posted on 02/21/2007 1:52:14 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

you do a real good job with your posts and I agree with you its early in the game and why can't we have a conservative for president for that is what wins elections! Something in my gut tells me its going to be a long time in the wilderness for republicans unless they can get back on track. I know you must be a good conservative for you sure use a lot of logic and history to make points with the people opposing you hurling irrational arguments and hyperbole.


84 posted on 02/21/2007 1:54:22 PM PST by assault_rifle123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL
Hillary! isn't Stalin, and Rudy isn't Trotsky, but that IS about the degree by which their views are separated. There just isn't much from which to choose from here. Even Rudy's own words d@mn him.

Rudy will kick conservatives into the kennel and tell 'em to shut up. There won't be any "bones;" conservatives to be told to be grateful that it isn't any worse. He has already lied about picking "strict constructionist" judges. - anybody who thinks the 2nd Amendment is about hunting wouldn't know "strict constructionism" or original intent if it bit him on the @$$.

Think about it - who's in Rudy's Rolodex? You can bet it isn't Heritage, Cato, the NRA or any conservative organization or individual. If Rudy is elected President the Republican party of the future will simply be another liberal party. Even if he's just nominated, thats the likely outcome. In this case it is better to lose the election than to lose the principles that should be guiding the GOP.
85 posted on 02/21/2007 1:57:49 PM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

You are correct. It was difficult to follow. It reminds me of an album cover for the band "Steeley Dan" that came out when I was kid. The title of the album?

"Pretzel Logic"


86 posted on 02/21/2007 1:59:45 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

"My only point is that Rudy is to the right of Hillary "

Almost every person alive in the world is to the right of Hillary.Hillary


87 posted on 02/21/2007 2:02:21 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: xhrist

Well I believe it is foolish, is that more to your liking. The lesser of two evils is always better than some foolish vote for someone that does not have a ghost of a chance to win thereby giving the election to the greater of two evils. If it comes down to Rudy I will hold my nose and vote for him and hope that he has an epiphany after taking office that allows him to become more conservative. While it is perhaps commendable to stick to your values, one thing you have to ask yourself is where exactly will my "values" and conscious lead me and more importantly my country to? Would I and my country have been better off to vote ofr at least some of the values I hold dear instead of ensuring that someone who holds none of my values be elected. Your kind of thinking got William Jefferson Clinton elected and I for one am mad as hell at those "conservatives" that split our vote twice and put him there because I am less safe now as a result and our country is in a much more vulnerable position.


88 posted on 02/21/2007 2:11:11 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
>>>>>No, I'm not labelling Giuliani a moderate. My only point is that Rudy is to the right of Hillary and to the left of Reagan. This seems to me to be true.

I disagree. Rudy and Hillary are left of center. They hold about the same liberal positions on most issues. Especially on social issues. Frankly, I've always viewed Rudy as a Joe Lieberman liberal. Joe gets a 17 lifetime rating from the ACU. Neither Rudy or Joe are anything but liberals who support big govt, abortion on demand, amnesty, gay rights, along with being global warming and gungrabbing kooks.

President Reagan was a conservative. Not a perfect conservative, mind you. But a rightwinger of the first order.

89 posted on 02/21/2007 2:12:40 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

The truth is, I am as disgusted as you are. Rudy Giuliani is not a real Conservative.

I would love to see a real Conservative ride on a white horse just like an old Western movie and save the town. But I don't think it is going to happen in 2008. I am open to the possibility, but I don't see it yet.

Neither Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter have the appeal it requires to win nationally. I think if we nominate one of them, we will just lose.

I think there is something to be said for losing with honor. That something is "We're screwed."

But I don't agree that all the voters who have strong Conservative values are just going to throw them away because they realize they have to vote for someone-who-is-just-good-enough-for-now. It is just for now.

When things get better, and Mr. Conservative-Right rides into town, we will all get behind him.

Look at what the Democrats are doing. Look at the media covering for them. If you think things are bad now, don't forget how much worse they can get.


90 posted on 02/21/2007 2:29:48 PM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

Its not a matter of selfish, its a matter of stupid.


91 posted on 02/21/2007 2:38:49 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
>>>>>No, I'm not labelling Giuliani a moderate. My only point is that Rudy is to the right of Hillary and to the left of Reagan. This seems to me to be true.

I disagree. Rudy and Hillary are left of center.

So your view is that Rudy and Hillary fall on precisely the same point on the Left-Right political spectrum? You think that Rudy is in fact not to the right of Hillary?

92 posted on 02/21/2007 2:39:57 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Being dead serious, my only beefs with Hunter are that he supported NCLB and the Medicare fiasco. But, I think I can chalk that up to loyalty to his President..


93 posted on 02/21/2007 2:42:02 PM PST by RockinRight (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

"Murtha closer to running the Iraq war...."

The Iraq war is why the republicans lost.


94 posted on 02/21/2007 2:43:12 PM PST by NapkinUser (Free Ramos and Compean! Disbarment for the Nifong-wannabe Johnny Sutton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Yeah, then you can blame God? That'd be okay with the 100%'ers, blame God but not themselves.


95 posted on 02/21/2007 2:49:32 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lucas McCain

In the mean time, we get a Clinton/Obama administration for 8 years.




We're a long way from even the primaries and you've given up! hahaha....these Hillary scare arguments are so weak...it's getting hysterical around here.


96 posted on 02/21/2007 2:54:05 PM PST by teldon30 (disgruntled 2nd class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Minn
Whatever you say, Mr. Olbermann. So what exactly attracts you to this forum?

Conservatives. But unfortunately there are a lot of radicals who are anything but conservative, especially those whose only argument is a personal attack.

97 posted on 02/21/2007 2:55:52 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

"radical right"




Someone wants to support a conservative in the primaries and election=radical right? Oh how far we have fallen.


98 posted on 02/21/2007 2:56:57 PM PST by teldon30 (disgruntled 2nd class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: shempy
What "whims" are your referring to, specifically? That whim we have about protecting the second amendment? Or are you talking about that whim we have about not murdering innocent unborn children? Please specify, as we are such a whimsical bunch that I am not sure which one of them you are objecting to.

Hard to know where to start, since the so-called social conservatives seem interested in only abortion, stem-cells, gay marriage, and a handful of other "social" issues that have hijacked the Party to this point, and which are of little interest to the American voters who will decide the next election on real issues.

99 posted on 02/21/2007 2:59:25 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
Just like I have the right to burn down my house if my wife burns dinner.

Arson is a right? That's a surprise. There must be some court rulings I haven't heard about.

You're so fired up about all this, so tell us: What did you do during the 2006 election cycle to turn out the vote for Republicans?

100 posted on 02/21/2007 3:12:41 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson