Cullen's blog is here:
http://climate.weather.com/blog/9_11396.html
The context of her blog is that meteorologists that disagree with her haven't read peer reviewed material. Her arrogance is especially grating.
You will note that she asks people to view a website, the "Pew Center's Climate Change 101" as a resource. Please note that the "Pew Center's Climate Change 101" does not contain peer reviewed articles. Then, a mere two sentences later, she assails meteorologists who don't review peer reviewed material!!!
The Weather Channel presents a nightly scaremongoring show "It Can Happen Tommorrow" (why is the Weather Channel presenting earthquake scenarios??).
Heidi Cullen is in no position to criticize others for accepting "junk political controversy" because she is one of the leading pushers of it.
She said if someone does not have a lot of time, it's a good resource. The report is fully referenced (sometimes to the IPCC reports, which are also fully referenced.)
Heidi Cullen is in no position to criticize others for accepting "junk political controversy" because she is one of the leading pushers of it.
Objection, your honor. Counsel is interjecting their opinion into this line of questioning.