She said if someone does not have a lot of time, it's a good resource. The report is fully referenced (sometimes to the IPCC reports, which are also fully referenced.)
Heidi Cullen is in no position to criticize others for accepting "junk political controversy" because she is one of the leading pushers of it.
Objection, your honor. Counsel is interjecting their opinion into this line of questioning.
Objection overruled. The evidence clearly indicates that Heidi Cullen is a significant distributor of junk political controversy. Kidd has provided documented evidence of two cases. It is not Kidd's opinion that Ms. Cullen made reference to a non-peer reviewed website as a n authoratative source of information. Nor is it Kidd's opinion that Ms. Cullen produces a nightly show designed to produce fear.
Could you please tell the court, Mr Cogitator, why the Weather Channel is in a position to present a show that features earthquakes and civilization-ending meteors?