"So long as training camps operate, so long as nations harbor terrorists, freedom is at risk and America and our allies must not, and will not, allow it." -- President George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 29, 2002.
Parse it any way you want, but the fact remains that the Iraqi Government is willfully and knowingly harboring self-confessed, and even at least one already-Convicted, Anti-American Terrorists -- as members of their Ruling Government, no less!
They are therefore in flagrant violation of declared United States anti-terrorist foreign policy, and are utterly unworthy of Military and Financial support.
Ron Paul seeks to END Military and Financial support to this Government which is willfully and knowingly harboring a Convicted Anti-American Terrorist. Ron Paul is, thus, the only TRULY 100% Anti-Terrorist Republican Candidate.
Iraq is in a flux, changing every day. Sure the "self confessed terrorists" you harp about are here today but may be gone tomorrow.
Not until at least the next elections in 2009. Gadzooks, how many excuses are you going to make for these Terrorists?
Honestly, if the Iraqis had elected Osama bin Laden to the Iraqi Parliament, would you say "Oh well, no big deal, here today but may be gone tomorrow"?? I'm beginning to wonder. Good grief!!
"So long as training camps operate, so long as nations harbor terrorists, freedom is at risk and America and our allies must not, and will not, allow it." -- President George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 29, 2002."
"They are therefore in flagrant violation of declared United States anti-terrorist foreign policy, and are utterly unworthy of Military and Financial support."
Good grief! As long as we are in Iraq we ARE doing something about a terrorist harboring nation, aren't we??? Yet what you and Ron Paul are apparently advocating is to pull out and quit doing something about it!! It makes no sense at all.
Step back, take a breath, remove the blinders, and look at the reality; if we say Iraq is "utterly unworthy of Military and Financial support" because of "self confessed terrorists" in its government, and withdraw our support of the good guys there (you cannot deny there are good guys there) we will be doing nothing about a "nation harboring terrorists", right?
Is doing nothing about a "nation harboring terrorists" what you and Ron Paul are advocating?
Yes or no.
DO you and Ron Paul think there are good guys in Iraq?
Yes or no.
Do you and Ron Paul really believe we are supporting the bad guys in Iraq, that is the sole reason we are there?
Yes or no.
Do you and Ron Paul believe abandoning the good guys in Iraq is the right thing to do??
Yes or no.
"Parse it any way you want, but the fact remains that the Iraqi Government is willfully and knowingly harboring self-confessed, and even at least one already-Convicted, Anti-American Terrorists -- as members of their Ruling Government, no less!"
You and Ron Paul have absolutely no hope that this can change, no hope or belief that the good guys can win the public debate??
Yes or no.