Replies

"So long as training camps operate, so long as nations harbor terrorists, freedom is at risk and America and our allies must not, and will not, allow it." -- President George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 29, 2002."

"They are therefore in flagrant violation of declared United States anti-terrorist foreign policy, and are utterly unworthy of Military and Financial support."

Good grief! As long as we are in Iraq we ARE doing something about a terrorist harboring nation, aren't we??? Yet what you and Ron Paul are apparently advocating is to pull out and quit doing something about it!! It makes no sense at all.

Step back, take a breath, remove the blinders, and look at the reality; if we say Iraq is "utterly unworthy of Military and Financial support" because of "self confessed terrorists" in its government, and withdraw our support of the good guys there (you cannot deny there are good guys there) we will be doing nothing about a "nation harboring terrorists", right?

Is doing nothing about a "nation harboring terrorists" what you and Ron Paul are advocating?

Yes or no.

DO you and Ron Paul think there are good guys in Iraq?

Yes or no.

Do you and Ron Paul really believe we are supporting the bad guys in Iraq, that is the sole reason we are there?

Yes or no.

Do you and Ron Paul believe abandoning the good guys in Iraq is the right thing to do??

Yes or no.

"Parse it any way you want, but the fact remains that the Iraqi Government is willfully and knowingly harboring self-confessed, and even at least one already-Convicted, Anti-American Terrorists -- as members of their Ruling Government, no less!"

You and Ron Paul have absolutely no hope that this can change, no hope or belief that the good guys can win the public debate??

Yes or no.

Is doing nothing about a "nation harboring terrorists" what you and Ron Paul are advocating? Yes or no.

No. We advocate cutting off Military and Financial support to this Terrorist-Harboring Government.

DO you and Ron Paul think there are good guys in Iraq? Yes or no.

Yes -- although I reserve that I don't have a lot of faith in ANY muslim politicians (we've been backstabbed by muslim "friends" before). Regardless, however, the majority government is guilt of harboring terrorists, in flagrant violation of declared United States anti-terrorist foreign policy.

Do you and Ron Paul really believe we are supporting the bad guys in Iraq, that is the sole reason we are there? Yes or no.

No, I don't believe that is the reason we are there. However, since the Iraqis have "democratically" elected Terrorists to majority power, our troops have been placed in the unfortunate position of defending a Government which is a Harbor of Terrorists. I do not believe that we should risk American Lives to support an Iraqi Government which is Harboring Terrorists.

Do you and Ron Paul believe abandoning the good guys in Iraq is the right thing to do?? Yes or no.

No. However, I do not believe that cutting off Military and Financial support to the Terrorist-harboring Majority Government in Iraq necessarily "abandons" the alleged "good guys". If a Foreign Power was giving Military and Financial support to the Democrats, and then removed that support, would that necessarily "hurt" the Republicans?

You and Ron Paul have absolutely no hope that this can change, no hope or belief that the good guys can win the public debate?? Yes or no.

"Yes" I have no Hope, or "No" I have no Hope? Your question's phrasing doesn't allow for me to answer "Yes, I have hope" (so I'll just say it). I do not believe that cutting off Military and Financial support to the Terrorist-harboring Majority Government in Iraq necessarily "abandons" the alleged "good guys". If a Foreign Power was giving Military and Financial support to the Democrats, and then removed that support, would that necessarily "hurt" the Republicans?