Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why John McCain
The Wall Street Journal ^ | February 20, 2007 | Phill Gram

Posted on 02/19/2007 11:42:10 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

Four years ago I decided to quit while I was ahead and concluded my 24-year political career. When I left the Senate, I also left the public policy debate and talking-head role to those actually in the arena. However, because I believe that the 2008 presidential election will be the most important election since 1980, I have decided to rejoin the national debate and exercise my right as a private citizen to express a strongly held opinion about who should be elected, and why.

--SNIP--

Today's mortal need is for a leader who trusts our people enough to tell them the truth about the festering domestic problems that have been swept under the rug for a quarter-century. We need a president who can face up to these problems even as he leads an increasingly reluctant country in a war against a dangerous enemy that will follow us home from any battlefield on which we are defeated.

Where is such a leader to be found? American history gives us a clue where to look: When the times have required great leaders in the past, they seem to have been there all the while, just waiting to be called. John Adams wrote in his diary in 1774 that "We have not Men, fit for the Times. We are deficient in Genius, in Education, in Travel, in Fortune -- in every Thing. I feel unutterable Anxiety."

Yet, at that very moment, the greatest assemblage of leadership the world has ever known was emerging all around him. We seem, for some reason, to be able to see greatness only in the rearview mirror.

I believe the man we need to meet the mortal need today is here. He is experienced, but has not lost his common sense or his ability to be outraged.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: MinorityRepublican

If McCainiac is the answer it's a damn stupid question!


41 posted on 02/20/2007 4:45:52 AM PST by LibKill (ENOUGH! Take the warning labels off everything and let Saint Darwin do his job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

The problem with that argument is that it simply isn't true.

If Hillary is elected, we will have a gun grabbing, baby killing, gay pandering flaming liberal President that has at least some opposition from the GOP.

If McCain wins, we will have a gun grabbing, baby killing, gay pandering flaming liberal President that has the full support of the GOP.


42 posted on 02/20/2007 4:55:48 AM PST by deaconjim (Because He lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The time for Senator McCain's leadership has past. Gone are the days when he could have supported the Bush administration with his good counsel, etc......

Senator Graham's WSJ splash fails to heal the wounds made by McCain's self-serving brinksmanship. Both are old men.

They need a porch for: SITTIN', STARIN' & ROCKIN'.


43 posted on 02/20/2007 4:57:31 AM PST by Broker (Haddi Nuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Those wishing to read the entire Gram article can go to http://www.nationalreview.com/ and look for the WSJ article link near the top right of the page. (I wasn't sure if we're allowed to post WSJ links.)


44 posted on 02/20/2007 4:59:08 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
when he pushed the McCain Feingold

And how about GWB? Did he get your vote after signing it into law?

45 posted on 02/20/2007 5:44:09 AM PST by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Any candidate who brazenly attacks the First Amendment doesn't pass the Dickie Flatt test.

How about the president who signs it into law?

46 posted on 02/20/2007 5:44:52 AM PST by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Huck
How about the president who signs it into law?

....or the Congress that passed it in the first place, or the Supreme Court that affirmed it?
The United States was an terrific experiment, good while it lasted.

47 posted on 02/20/2007 8:03:52 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Huck
How about the president who signs it into law?

That makes me glad he can't run for a third term. Between CFR and his stance on immigration and his drug entitlement program, he has damaged this party almost beyond repair. I support him in the WOT, but disagree with almost everything else domestically. BTW, I did hold my nose and vote him for him in 2004.

48 posted on 02/20/2007 8:07:46 AM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

It's still the best game in town. You just can't count on politicians for anything except bs.


49 posted on 02/20/2007 8:08:06 AM PST by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one

I don't know who first, but when McCain drops out (and he will be forced tto do so, I want to buy a ticket for that show. It will be worth the money. You can't beat that man for freaking out when he doesn't get his own way. They will need one of those old vaudeville hooks to get him off the stage. Can't wait!


50 posted on 02/20/2007 8:52:05 AM PST by twonie (RUDY FOR PRESIDENT '08. THERE - A COMMITMENT OUT LOUD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: zook

Well - here is a McCain semi-supporter. What do we do now?


51 posted on 02/20/2007 8:55:59 AM PST by twonie (RUDY FOR PRESIDENT '08. THERE - A COMMITMENT OUT LOUD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: twonie

Why should you do anything other than think about what I say?

There are more McCain supporters and "semi-supporters" around here than you think.


52 posted on 02/20/2007 9:14:24 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Believe it or not, there's a McCain PING list here. BARF


53 posted on 02/20/2007 9:18:34 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Good night Chesty, wherever you are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zook; TitansAFC; therut; zbigreddogz
The McCain List.
Common sense conservatism

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

The Official McCain Platform: Human Dignity & the Sanctity of Life
54 posted on 02/20/2007 8:13:08 PM PST by Norman Bates (The McCain List -- Freepmail me to get on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zook

I think people are getting nervous that McCain is getting real, credentialed conservative endorsements. If Reagan were to come back and endorse McCain, I suspect more than a few would tell Reagan to "Shut...up," claim that they never liked him, and that he was never a "real" conservative anyway.


55 posted on 02/20/2007 8:18:16 PM PST by Norman Bates (The McCain List -- Freepmail me to get on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
McCain died, as far as I'm concerned when he pushed the McCain Feingold bill.

So did Bush die to you when he signed it?

56 posted on 02/20/2007 8:49:42 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson