Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
He said Rumsfeld never put enough troops on the ground to succeed in Iraq.

Maybe McCain doesn't read history. We had a half million soldiers in Vietnam. He must of missed that while staying at the Hanoi Hilton. Someone should let him know.

Rummy was right not to repeat the mistake. It would have been more fodder for the roadside bombers and surface to air missiles. What we don't know is who stopped us from using more aggressive strategies like MOABing the Sunni Triangle and Sadr City and carrying out hot pursuit across enemy borders.

37 posted on 02/19/2007 12:34:27 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

Was it Rumsfeld's idea to fight a politically correct counterinsurgency in Iraq, or Colin Powell's, or President Bush's? Whose idea was it to leave Iran and Syria off-limits as no-go sanctuaries for the terrorist "insurgents"? I seem to recall that the State Department was given a huge role in running the occupation, and that Paul Bremer - who everybody acknowledges made a ton of serious mistakes there - wasn't exactly Rummy's man.

I think hanging all the blame on Rumsfeld for what the leftist media and defeatist Democrat party have spent three years selling as a "quagmire" in Iraq is a copout. Furthermore, the United States military is not losing in Iraq. They just haven't been allowed to do what's necessary to win. Maybe now they will be, if our beloved lazy, easily distracted public will show some backbone.

Hindsight is 20/20, of course.


56 posted on 02/19/2007 12:44:44 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson