To: NormsRevenge
2 posted on
02/19/2007 10:21:59 AM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......)
To: NormsRevenge
North American Union.
Not until EVERYBODY speaks English, and a rule of common law is extended everywhere that is now in force in the US. (Well, MOST of the US, anyway.)
Are you listening, Quebec?
3 posted on
02/19/2007 10:33:25 AM PST by
alloysteel
(If you don’t avenge, you’re not a real Muslim.The whole community will look down on you as a coward.)
To: NormsRevenge
Just one more step towards forming the biblical one-world govt
5 posted on
02/19/2007 10:39:54 AM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: NormsRevenge
I'm probably going to really get flamed on this, but I see this now as inevitable. Moreover, the proud but peasant society of Mexico and the socialistic, somewhat snotty Canadians are going to be just as unamicable as we conservatives are to the idea of 'one big family.' However, the present geopolitical alignments globally and the Administration's refusal to address the immigration issues is pushing things this way IMO. It is the only answer that makes sense.
Here is the bigger problem - if we believe in the American system and way of life, we need to be adamant that we will not accept the partial freedoms dictated by any governments of the nations joining us. Freedom should always be the first thing we speak to. The unfortunate reality is that we have not propagated the principles of conservative freedom to the greater world; we have allowed the conservative discourse to split into factions that hold one specific agenda rather than speak about the essence of what freedom itself is, and the socialist/liberal/communist agenda has benefited from that.
As a result, we are now in a truly Orwellian phase of 'new speak' where the language has been rewritten to meet the objectives of the liberals and to silence their critics. This is true in terms of judicial law, academia, the media, and politics. We need to regain the higher ground in these areas if American freedom will survive into the 22nd century, regardless of how many other nations join the United States. For this, we need leaders who are articulate, not firebrands.
This is why I don't do much arguing on the border issue. Our own internal rot is what will bring us down. The Mexicans need to have true reform in their own government, and it is to our peril we have not 'exported' freedom to that nation.
With monsters now running part of Latin America, we need to make sure we do not end up with a hardline communist regime on our southern border. I'm willing to take Mexico forward to prevent that. Its not us against them - it is a dangerous world against Western culture, and Eurabia (with the possible exception of a slowly awakening but already compromised Britain) is not going to help us.
Will this lead to bloodshed? Yes, there will be fierce resistance to this plan from all three countries. But, if the battle becomes one of stopping the hemisphere from falling to communism or, worse, Islam, we must be willing to do whatever it takes. There is NO END in sight at the moment; the 50 years of postwar US peace is over forever now. The real question is how to bring conservatism to the forefront of the philosophical battle as quickly as possible.
So flame away; this is just my take on what the real issues are here...
6 posted on
02/19/2007 11:00:59 AM PST by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
To: NormsRevenge
Coming to a flagpole near you soon!
7 posted on
02/19/2007 11:06:26 AM PST by
Eastbound
To: NormsRevenge
We have a two party system of government. I see nothing from that system that is much opposed to one world government. The little picture that is focused on here at FR magnifies the differences between Democrats and Republicans. In truth when it comes to selling out our sovereignity there is little difference between the Democrats in Clinton family and Republicans in the Bush family.
To: NormsRevenge
now, why would the vast majority of americans every let this happen?
I know most of us sleep walk through most of the politicians bill passing and sneaking around but if they wanted to take away our sovereignty? disolve our country you don't think civil war would ensue? I mean, there are enough intelligent people left in this country who I doubt would stand for this.
although I could be wrong.
To: NormsRevenge
AIM appears to be conflicted on this conspiracy.
Tho I never read Kincaid's article and I can't find it at the link, I did read Wes Vernon's article published at AIM and it seemed to undermine any conspiricy theory.
In fact, were it not for Vernon's article, we would not know of Corsi's connection to the United Transportation Workers Union.
To: NormsRevenge
I can see a day when all the Americas, North and South, will be linked in a mighty system-a system in which the errors and misunderstandings of the past will be submerged one by one in a rising tide of prosperity and interdependence. We know that the misunderstandings of centuries are not to be wiped away in a day or wiped away in an hour. But we pledge, we pledge, that human sympathy-what our neighbors to the south call an attitude of simpatico--no less than enlightened self'-interest will be our guide. And I can see this Atlantic civilization galvanizing and guiding emergent nations everywhere. Now, I know this freedom is not the fruit of every soil. I know that our own freedom was achieved through centuries by unremitting efforts by brave and wise men. And I know that the road to freedom is a long and a challenging road, and I know also that some men may walk away from it, that some men resist challenge, accepting the false security of governmental paternalism.--
Barry Goldwater, Cow Palace, San Francisco, CA, 1964
go figure
18 posted on
02/19/2007 1:01:27 PM PST by
gusopol3
To: NormsRevenge
To: All
Beware of the Stonecutters!!!!!!!!!!
25 posted on
02/19/2007 6:12:00 PM PST by
KevinDavis
(“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual ways of preserving peace” – George Washington)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson