Accuracy in Media Exposes North American Union 'Conspiracy'

U.S. Newswire on Yahoo ^ | Accuracy in Media

[NormsRevenge]

WASHINGTON, Feb. 19 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Accuracy in Media has released a new report examining charges that a former Carter Administration official is behind a sinister campaign to create a North American Union that will submerge American sovereignty in a trilateral entity consisting of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The report is available at http://www.aim.org.

The report was prepared by Cliff Kincaid, editor of Accuracy in Media, who attended a February 16 conference on the subject of developing a North American legal system. Kincaid concludes that the evidence clearly indicates "that a comprehensive process is underway to merge the economies, and perhaps the social and political systems, of the three countries."

AIM attended the conference in order to shed light on a process that is being conducted largely beyond the scrutiny of the public or the Congress, and which has been generally ignored by the major U.S. media.

The report is also based, in part, on Kincaid's interview of American University's Robert Pastor, the former Carter Administration official depicted by some as the main organizer of the "conspiracy" to establish a North American Union. Pastor's Center for North American Studies sponsored the conference and Pastor was a featured speaker. Kincaid commented, "The 'conspiracy' is now very much out in the open, if only the media would pay some attention to it."

The Kincaid report examines how the Clinton and Bush Administrations have laid the groundwork for what Pastor calls the North American "entity."

Kincaid is now challenging the media to report on how a North American Union, or "North American Community," as Pastor also calls it, could result in the destruction of American sovereignty and the alteration of U.S. domestic laws and traditions on such matters as abortion, homosexual rights and the death penalty.

Accuracy in Media (AIM) is a non-profit, grassroots citizens' watchdog of the news media that critiques botched and bungled news stories and sets the record straight on important issues that have received slanted coverage. For more information, please visit http://www.aim.org.

[NormsRevenge]

Accuracy in Media (AIM)

[alloysteel]

North American Union.

Not until EVERYBODY speaks English, and a rule of common law is extended everywhere that is now in force in the US. (Well, MOST of the US, anyway.)

Are you listening, Quebec?

[em2vn]

Why? It shouldn't ever exist.

[lilylangtree]

Just one more step towards forming the biblical one-world govt

[Amalie]

I'm probably going to really get flamed on this, but I see this now as inevitable. Moreover, the proud but peasant society of Mexico and the socialistic, somewhat snotty Canadians are going to be just as unamicable as we conservatives are to the idea of 'one big family.' However, the present geopolitical alignments globally and the Administration's refusal to address the immigration issues is pushing things this way IMO. It is the only answer that makes sense.

Here is the bigger problem - if we believe in the American system and way of life, we need to be adamant that we will not accept the partial freedoms dictated by any governments of the nations joining us. Freedom should always be the first thing we speak to. The unfortunate reality is that we have not propagated the principles of conservative freedom to the greater world; we have allowed the conservative discourse to split into factions that hold one specific agenda rather than speak about the essence of what freedom itself is, and the socialist/liberal/communist agenda has benefited from that.

As a result, we are now in a truly Orwellian phase of 'new speak' where the language has been rewritten to meet the objectives of the liberals and to silence their critics. This is true in terms of judicial law, academia, the media, and politics. We need to regain the higher ground in these areas if American freedom will survive into the 22nd century, regardless of how many other nations join the United States. For this, we need leaders who are articulate, not firebrands.

This is why I don't do much arguing on the border issue. Our own internal rot is what will bring us down. The Mexicans need to have true reform in their own government, and it is to our peril we have not 'exported' freedom to that nation.
With monsters now running part of Latin America, we need to make sure we do not end up with a hardline communist regime on our southern border. I'm willing to take Mexico forward to prevent that. Its not us against them - it is a dangerous world against Western culture, and Eurabia (with the possible exception of a slowly awakening but already compromised Britain) is not going to help us.

Will this lead to bloodshed? Yes, there will be fierce resistance to this plan from all three countries. But, if the battle becomes one of stopping the hemisphere from falling to communism or, worse, Islam, we must be willing to do whatever it takes. There is NO END in sight at the moment; the 50 years of postwar US peace is over forever now. The real question is how to bring conservatism to the forefront of the philosophical battle as quickly as possible.

So flame away; this is just my take on what the real issues are here...

[Eastbound]

Coming to a flagpole near you soon!

[pandoraou812]

Not on my flag pole... I will chop it down 1st. Shaking my head again that they would ever try to pull this bs on us.

[Biblebelter]

We have a two party system of government. I see nothing from that system that is much opposed to one world government. The little picture that is focused on here at FR magnifies the differences between Democrats and Republicans. In truth when it comes to selling out our sovereignity there is little difference between the Democrats in Clinton family and Republicans in the Bush family.

[mr_hammer]

"So flame away; this is just my take on what the real issues are here..."

Believe you hit the nail on the head. What I find disconcerting is the fact that the MSM and our own government even refuses to discuss the issue with us. That elitist, snob-a** attitude that "you just don't understand" is sickening.

[annelizly]

now, why would the vast majority of americans every let this happen?

I know most of us sleep walk through most of the politicians bill passing and sneaking around but if they wanted to take away our sovereignty? disolve our country you don't think civil war would ensue? I mean, there are enough intelligent people left in this country who I doubt would stand for this.

although I could be wrong.

[Islander7]

BANG!

[Islander7]

Unfortunately, the wave of illegals flooding the country plays directly to the plans for this 'union'. Once they are here, we can't get them out, officials will say. So, let's just unite with Mexico and Canada and become one big happy family.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!

I would imagine our Canadian friends have a thing or two to say on this matter too. Apparently, no one asked them for their input or permission to sell out their country either.

[philman_36]

We have a two party system of government.
Am I wrong in my understanding that republicanism (A republican form or system of government; the principles or theory of republican government.), and not a two party system, is our system of government?
What from the Founding Fathers leads you to believe that America was established as a two party system of government?

As a humorous aside...The Single Party
Correction: Half of all Americans seem to believe this; the other, more sensible half don’t bother voting. Partisans of the system regard this as a worrisome sign of civic sloth. It’s actually a sign of realism. What’s more, if you vote for a minor party offering what you really believe in, you are said to be “wasting” your vote. What a comment on democracy!
Of course, America wasn't founded as a Democracy, but Sobran already knows that.

[Ben Ficklin]

AIM appears to be conflicted on this conspiracy.

Tho I never read Kincaid's article and I can't find it at the link, I did read Wes Vernon's article published at AIM and it seemed to undermine any conspiricy theory.

In fact, were it not for Vernon's article, we would not know of Corsi's connection to the United Transportation Workers Union.

[zerosix]

Ronald Reagan was the only president in recent history that has opposed such blending of borders, countries and societies. The rest are all only interested in "peaceful," trade that would merge No. America as a "fair" way to deal with different monetary issues, etc.

[Ben Ficklin]

NAFTA Chapter 11 was written in the Reagan Whitehouse.

[gusopol3]

I can see a day when all the Americas, North and South, will be linked in a mighty system-a system in which the errors and misunderstandings of the past will be submerged one by one in a rising tide of prosperity and interdependence. We know that the misunderstandings of centuries are not to be wiped away in a day or wiped away in an hour. But we pledge, we pledge, that human sympathy-what our neighbors to the south call an attitude of simpatico--no less than enlightened self'-interest will be our guide. And I can see this Atlantic civilization galvanizing and guiding emergent nations everywhere. Now, I know this freedom is not the fruit of every soil. I know that our own freedom was achieved through centuries by unremitting efforts by brave and wise men. And I know that the road to freedom is a long and a challenging road, and I know also that some men may walk away from it, that some men resist challenge, accepting the false security of governmental paternalism.-- Barry Goldwater, Cow Palace, San Francisco, CA, 1964

go figure

[<1/1,000,000th%]

What happened to Cuba?

[Biblebelter]

We have a two party system of government. Am I wrong in my understanding that republicanism (A republican form or system of government; the principles or theory of republican government.), and not a two party system, is our system of government? What from the Founding Fathers leads you to believe that America was established as a two party system of government? As a humorous aside...The Single Party Correction: Half of all Americans seem to believe this; the other, more sensible half don’t bother voting. Partisans of the system regard this as a worrisome sign of civic sloth. It’s actually a sign of realism. What’s more, if you vote for a minor party offering what you really believe in, you are said to be “wasting” your vote. What a comment on democracy! Of course, America wasn't founded as a Democracy, but Sobran already knows that.

From the general thrust of my post, it could be taken that I questioned whether we do have a two party system of government. And to reiterate what you posted, I realize that we do not have a two party system of government although that is the prevailing perception and that perception seems to keep the minority that does vote relatively satisfied. We do not only not have a two party system of government, our representatives do not reflect much opposition to each other than the fashion of their opinions which too many take for substantive differences. But it is that debate over the difference in fashion which keeps forums like this one going as I do believe it is the prevailing perception on this forum that the two parties are profoundly different.