To: Registered
Hunter has the credentials, but lacks the governing experience, persona and charisma necessary to win. So I am not for Hunter. I am on this thread to explain WHY he can't win to people that actually believe he has a chance, which he does not. As far as any of the other candidates, I am undecided. We are going against the Clinton political machine in this one. It is going to take a candidate with unique ability to win this.
For someone who is so utterly oriented around the State of Michigan, I find it curious that you are focusing your negative efforts on a solid conservative Republican Congressman from California, who has more national security experience and expertise than any other candidate in the field. We're approximately a year away from even the first primaries, why do you think it is so critical to knock down Hunter at this early stage when you claim you don't even know who you're going to support?
Of COURSE it is sheer coincidence that Michigan is the home state of George Romney and his son Willard Mitt Romney, right?
Of course it is.
Heh. My friend, you are not fooling anyone here.
154 posted on
02/19/2007 12:58:36 PM PST by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: mkjessup
Of COURSE it is sheer coincidence that Michigan is the home state of George Romney and his son Willard Mitt Romney, right?
Uh, yeh. It IS a sheer coincidence. As far as Romney, I personally think he should move BACK to Michigan so he can run for the Governorship AFTER Granholm's term expires.
156 posted on
02/19/2007 1:03:40 PM PST by
Registered
(Politics is the art of the possible)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson