Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/18/2007 7:26:51 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Gallup survey last month found that Democrats led Republicans by 34 percent to 31 percent in party affiliation

Can Gallup explain why, they then weight their polls with a 7-10 % favor to Democrats?

2 posted on 02/18/2007 7:36:32 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I'll take "Conservative Slump" for $300.

The source of Liberal(Socialist) success is Conservative failure. The Socialists offer nothing but the same crap with slightly different packaging (Kyoto Protocol, Price Controls, Minimum Wage, Universal Health Care, Windfall Profits Taxes, are wealth redistribution with slightly different labels). The Democrats who are beholden to the Socialists have the same plan of government, rob one class to bribe another class for votes. The only reason the people vote for these Demo-Socialists is that people who are allegedly Conservative fail to carry through with governing like Conservatives.

People want Conservatives to vote for, not Socialists with Rs in front of their names.
3 posted on 02/18/2007 7:46:19 PM PST by Quick or Dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The right is seen as divided, demoralized and possibly saddled with a top duo of Republican presidential candidates — John McCain and Rudy Giuliani".

The nyt along with the rest of the msm will do its best to see that this comes to pass.
4 posted on 02/18/2007 7:55:04 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The right is seen as divided, demoralized and possibly saddled..."

That's true, and it is an intential effort by Hillary's girls. Democrat-minded feminists were infiltrating and redirecting Republican discussions during the 1800s. If you want to continue to put up with it, then say goodbye to the last of traditional family and capitalism, folks. Because it is an effort to have Hillary elected.
5 posted on 02/18/2007 8:10:48 PM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

...intentional, even.


6 posted on 02/18/2007 8:11:15 PM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

To quote Crash Davis in Bull Durham: The moment's over.


7 posted on 02/18/2007 8:15:20 PM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
For some reason the words Leftist and Ho seem to go very well together.
8 posted on 02/18/2007 8:25:23 PM PST by Candor7 (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
A third, Mitt Romney, was just four years ago elected governor of a state — Massachusetts — that many Republicans regard as the political equivalent of a Superfund site.

I hate it when the Slimes makes me laugh.

11 posted on 02/18/2007 9:47:08 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("We live in the era of over-reaction." - Sir Alex Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem


I don't care how many of them there are THEY'RE WRONG.


12 posted on 02/18/2007 9:53:42 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It's sad but true that the word "liberal" and the word "traitor" have become essentially synonomous.


13 posted on 02/18/2007 10:06:55 PM PST by Lucas McCain (The gene pool could use a little chlorine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson