Who's to say?
But, I wouldn't rule it out.
romney SEEMS a little too SLICK, ala bill clinton, to me.
I don't yet know enough about him to trust him, support him, or vote for him.
Why take the time to try and FIGURE OUT a man like romney, ESPECIALLY when there are MUCH better men out there that leave NO DOUBT as to what they are all about?
Wouldn't it make better sense to support and promote men whose words and deeds have stayed true to our CONSERVATIVE ideals for MOST, if not, ALL of their lives?
Likewise, why should we wait BREATHLESSLY for RINO-rudy to CHANGE his position on an issue we consider an important CONSERVATIVE CORE-issue? Trying to morph one's LIBERAL opinion/view, into a LAST MINUTE, pre-election CONSERVATIVE opinion/view, is OUTRAGEOUSLY DISINGENUOUS, and if he DOES try it, it should be summarily discounted by all intelligent, informed (read that CONSERVATIVE) voters.
Why not put ALL of our support behind a known TRUE CONSERVATIVE like Hunter, or one of the others with their hats in the ring?
Just say NO to liberal RINOs and unknown clintonesque SLICKSTERS.
As of now, Mr. Romney is my choice.