To: madprof98
Nah. I am a proud member of the so-called "religious right". What is key in this Wallis fellow's screed is "most of the people I talk to". Well, just imagine who shows up for this guy. This is akin to "How did Reagan win, nobody I know voted for him" coming out of the upper west side salons.
Yet, we here respond to it as if it was fact, not propaganda. Aside from the little slivers of blue surrounding the large metro areas which themselves surround most of the re-education camps that used to be our great universities, this is a Red Nation. Sooner than later we'll have had enough.
As to "evangelicals" on this site supporting Rudy: I suspect that many, like myself, do not support him at this point, but will definitely vote for him if he is the nominee against any democrat. This past weeks congressional treasons ought to tell us all we need to know about "teaching the rino's a lesson".
38 posted on
02/17/2007 6:42:17 AM PST by
prov1813man
(While the one you despise and ridicule works to protect you, those you embrace work to destroy you)
To: prov1813man
"As to "evangelicals" on this site supporting Rudy: I suspect that many, like myself, do not support him at this point, but will definitely vote for him if he is the nominee against any democrat. This past weeks congressional treasons ought to tell us all we need to know about "teaching the rino's a lesson"."
REPLY:
Amen brother you hit the nail on the head.
At least with Rudy we would have some leverage.
However, with a Hellary or Obamma (Hugo Chavez wannabe's) we would be wearing sack cloth and ashes literally before the end of four years of Tax and Spend Malaise.
It is my lowly opinion that this next election will redefine and shape America for generations to come.
As you say we can already feel the effects of the 06 election.
Already the coward Liberals are rolling around and muck diving in the fecal sludge known as the Democrat sewer.
Leaving this for the traitours secular Democrats to define for all citizens is a bigger risk than playing Russian Roulet with a loaded gun.
Only fools and the depreciated intelligent would even think of putting a Democrat into leadership.
162 posted on
02/17/2007 8:54:33 AM PST by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
To: prov1813man
As to "evangelicals" on this site supporting Rudy: I suspect that many, like myself, do not support him at this point, but will definitely vote for him if he is the nominee against any democrat. This past weeks congressional treasons ought to tell us all we need to know about "teaching the rino's a lesson". Exactly my attitude. I want Hunter. I'll take Rudy. I'm not sure about Romney. I'm horrified that McCain is even under discussion. I love Newt but his negatives are higher than Hillary's and there's no way he'll get elected.
One other thing: As much as I don't like him for president, I suspect Rudy's character is such that that the Congressional RINO's stabbing our troops in the back are unfit to shine his shoes.
270 posted on
02/17/2007 2:44:45 PM PST by
Mr. Silverback
("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson