Replies

I rather see him as a politically vacuous and ambitious suit. Something of a upper class Republican moderate managerial, but not leadership, yuppie.

He wouldn't be the worst thing to happen.

The notion that he is, has or will execute anything other than what is now know as 'compassionate conservatives' is amusing at best.

Massachusetts politics is dirty, rough, public and verbal. Mitt pretty much stayed on the sidelines bidding his time for the next rung on the Mitt ambition ladder. Under his 'leadership' the state Republican party has declined to a glass display booth in some museum. Not that he was responsible.

He's not a leader. He's a manager. He doesn't make new realities, he deals with them. He is the very successful model of a type.

We can only work with what we've got.

Mitt's better than either Guiliani or Hillary and at least he is running on a conservative platform compatable with the current GOP platform, which a Guiliani nomination might radically change. I don't want to see that happen.

I also believe Mitt is currently the only candidate in the field who can beat Hillary.