The 'logic' of those refusing to vote for Rudy:
Rudy is a too 'liberal' 'New Yorker' so they will place their de facto vote for missus clinton, a Stalinist New Yorker, albeit fake, (fake New Yorker, not fake Stalinist), who
as one-half of the 'twofer,' is the proximate cause of 9/11,
is an abuser of women in her own right,
is avidly pro-abortion,
would nominate justices in the mold of Ruth Bader Ginsburg,
would resume clinton sale of our nuclear secrets and mineral rights to the enemy,
would sic the IRS and the clinton 'secret police' on all opponents and critics,
would nationalize healthcare,
would decimate the military,
would reinstitute the clinton policy of ignoring of terrorism,
would raise taxes...
even as she and her rapist husband rake in millions in quid pro quos for their slush fund foundation,
would confiscate profits, end capitalism, if she could, etc., etc.
It does the conservative cause no good to become petulant and self-destructive.
Do conservatives really want
a Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court instead of an Alito, Roberts or Scalia?
marginalization, if not worse, of their religious beliefs?
a return to the amorality, immorality and corruption of the clinton years?
and G-d knows what depth of failure in the War on Terror?
I find it hard to believe that those people aren't able to discern the difference between Giuliani and Clinton. Frankly, if true, it is frightening.
I am advocating for Giuliani not because of his ideology. I am advocating for him because I believe he possesses the qualities that this country desperately needs in these perilous times... and because I believe he, unlike all the others, will win.
The other night, I heard a man who is not perfect, but a man of rare intelligence, humility, warmth, competence, strength and leadership.
We will be fortunate, indeed, and our babies, born and unborn, living and not yet imagined, will be infinitely safer, if he is our next president.
Mega Dittos to Tyrrell's comments!