Skip to comments.
9/11 questions [BBC Joins Tinfoil "Truthers"]
BBC ^
| Feb. 14, 2007
| Mike Rudin
Posted on 02/16/2007 8:18:54 AM PST by Alouette
Lots of questions have been raised about 9/11:
Why was the hole in the Pentagon wall so small and why was there so little damage to the outer wall?
Why does it look like there is no plane at the crash site in Pennsylvania where flight United 93 came down?
Why did a building called World Trade Centre Building 7 collapse even though it was never hit by an aircraft?
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; bbc; conspiracy; really
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: atomicpossum
Yes 343 of NY's Bravest murdered along with thousands of others so Bush could start some wars. Then Giuliani must be in on it too.
/s
61
posted on
02/16/2007 9:37:22 AM PST
by
petercooper
("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
To: Dems_R_Losers
There have been lots of pictures posted on FreeRepublic and all over the Internet showing huge pieces of easily recognizable airplane debris of Flight 77.
62
posted on
02/16/2007 9:39:50 AM PST
by
Alouette
(Learned Mother of Zion)
To: Calpernia
If you'll put down your crack pipe long enough to actually think about this question, take a look at your transcript:
'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.'
If "pull it" means demolish the building, how does that in any way relate to or follow from the first part of the sentence about loss of life?
63
posted on
02/16/2007 9:42:37 AM PST
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: petercooper
Yes 343 of NY's Bravest murdered along with thousands of others so Bush could start some wars. Then Giuliani must be in on it too. /s Of course....see how big this conspiracy is? It's PRACTICALLY EVERYBODY but the Arabs.
(It's amazing how this conspiracy has to keep getting bigger and bigger. Pretty soon we'll all have to have been part of it.)
64
posted on
02/16/2007 9:43:07 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: atomicpossum
Just so you know, Penn and Teller are also flaming atheists who have trashed the Bible in their show "Bullshit".
65
posted on
02/16/2007 9:45:04 AM PST
by
khnyny
To: Calpernia
So while they were fighting fires and attempting to save people...in the building.....they were also preparing to blow-up the building. Why would they be so open with their discussion, why not take it down as the towers collasped...?
Honestly.....this is the stupidest theory I have ever come across.....
Use your brain....what firemen would enter an inferno knowing explosives were strewn all around???
You just can't make this stuff up....really, you just can't....God help us....
66
posted on
02/16/2007 9:45:11 AM PST
by
PigRigger
(Donate to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org - The Troops have our front covered, let's guard their backs!)
To: Alouette
The moonbats are quick to tell us all about how stupid Bush is and how incompetent his administration is, and yet they are just as quick to tell us all about how this gang of idiots managed to pull off this massive plot.
As for WTC-7, what possible reason would there be to destroy it without a plane impact as cover for the explosion? Was there supposed to be another plane which was planned to hit WTC-7 that never arrived and they had to blow it up to hide the explosives that were already planted? No way. They would never have planned to destroy an insignificant building like WTC-7. They would have gone for the Empire State building.
It just doesn't make any sense.
67
posted on
02/16/2007 9:46:00 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Vaclav Klaus: "A whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
To: khnyny
Just so you know, Penn and Teller are also flaming atheists who have trashed the Bible in their show "Bullshit". Yes, I know. But the fact that someone so far from my opinion on one matter can agree with me on this issue speask volumes.
68
posted on
02/16/2007 9:48:51 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: wideawake
And it's impossible for the planes' wings to break away from the fuselage or fold up, even though they're designed to do that.
They say the hole in the Pentagon isn't big enough for a plane to have gone through by referencing other previous crashes to bomb resistant buildings that number in the one digits. That digit being zero.
69
posted on
02/16/2007 9:49:50 AM PST
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: Calpernia
>>>Why did a building called World Trade Center Building 7 collapse even though it was never hit by an aircraft?
I do find this one intriguing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNEoiOP76QQ
Larry Silverstien stating he said 'Pull it'.
I shouldn't really get angry at these kinds of comments but as someone who had her wedding lunch at a restaurant in World Trade Center 7 (and now have no place to go to revisit one of the happiest days of my life), I DO resent it.
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
That digit being zero.LOL! See? Point proven.
To: Alouette
72
posted on
02/16/2007 9:59:23 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: atomicpossum
73
posted on
02/16/2007 10:00:13 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
Demolition experts will tell you that "pull it" means nothing to them. Thus, the Silverstein interview means nothing. Think about it.....if it was a conspiracy to destroy the building, why would he admit it? On tape? Do yourself a big favor and quit being the fecal product of what happens when shame eats too much stupidity.
74
posted on
02/16/2007 10:01:11 AM PST
by
Niteranger68
(Point your toilets towards Mecca!)
To: RacerF150
Take you insults and pound them up your arse.
75
posted on
02/16/2007 10:03:39 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
There was no brigade there. Then who planted the bombs?
Oh, right, it was a remote-controlled Dick Cheney.
76
posted on
02/16/2007 10:08:20 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: atomicpossum
That would be a question for Silverstein. Not me. I just pasted his words and the Fema report.
77
posted on
02/16/2007 10:14:57 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
Yeah...you pasted from the FEMA report, and ignored the pages and pages following the one line you selected outlining likely causes of failure of WTC-7, including the outlining of massive damage to the building
even though, as the 'truther' liars insist, "it was never hit by an airplane." Well, pick and choose, that's the way to beleive in conspiracies.
78
posted on
02/16/2007 10:25:22 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: atomicpossum
I was referencing the section that stated there was no brigade in the building. I didn't ignore a thing.
79
posted on
02/16/2007 10:27:15 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
No, you've been claiming that the building was brought down deliberately, as the Beeb's 'interesting question' implies. Your only support for this is a word you decided meant one thing when there is no evidence it means any such thing. Meanwhile, all the extensions of that assertion and the growing and wide-ranging conspiracy that stems from it continues to become more convoluted, unlikely, and bizarre, as they always do when someone clings to something they invent rather than what is obvious before their eyes.
Good day-- I will ignore you from this point in, as you are obviously tied wholeheartedly to something every bit as odious as the philosophy of the Jihadis who really DID commit this act of terrorism.
80
posted on
02/16/2007 10:31:40 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson