Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
The Delaware senator, who voted in 2002 to authorize military intervention in Iraq, said he was working to repeal the authorization and to replace it with "a much narrower mission statement for our troops in Iraq."

Congress should make clear the mission is to draw down U.S. forces in Iraq while continuing to combat terrorists, train Iraqis and respond to emergencies, he said.

Biden needs to be reminded that the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces -- not Congress. Congress has no business defining the mission statement for our troops in Iraq or anywhere else.
4 posted on 02/15/2007 10:44:05 AM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCmember

Better yet - to repeal that authority - uhm - Doesn't the President have to sign it???

I don't see that happening anytime soon.


28 posted on 02/15/2007 12:20:30 PM PST by fremont_steve (Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCmember
Biden needs to be reminded that the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces -- not Congress. Congress has no business defining the mission statement for our troops in Iraq or anywhere else.

To the extent that the War Powers Act is facially unConstitutional, of course you are correct.

However, any act that Congress is capable of enacting, it can repeal.

37 posted on 02/15/2007 1:46:20 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson