Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Vows to Narrow Bush's Iraq Mandate [move to repeal the authority Congress gave President...]
BREITBART ^

Posted on 02/15/2007 10:41:21 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Biden Vows to Narrow Bush's Iraq Mandate

Feb 15 1:22 PM US/Eastern

By BARRY SCHWEID AP Diplomatic Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden said Thursday he would move to repeal the authority Congress gave President Bush in 2002 to send U.S. troops into Iraq and replace it with a narrower mandate.

The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said the legislation was based on the idea that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was designed to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

"The WMDs were not there," Biden said in prepared remarks at the Brookings Institution, a private research group. "Saddam Hussein is no longer there. The 2002 authorization is no longer relevant to the situation in Iraq."

The Delaware senator, who voted in 2002 to authorize military intervention in Iraq, said he was working to repeal the authorization and to replace it with "a much narrower mission statement for our troops in Iraq."

Congress should make clear the mission is to draw down U.S. forces in Iraq while continuing to combat terrorists, train Iraqis and respond to emergencies, he said.

"We should make equally clear what their mission is not: to stay in Iraq indefinitely and get mired in a savage civil war," Biden said.

Biden long has criticized Bush's strategy in Iraq. It is not clear whether he would be able to draw enough congressional support to succeed in his effort which also would face a Bush veto.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dumbestsenator; plagiarist; plugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Yet another wannabe Commander in Chief sounding off. You know The President really needs to stand up and tell these empty suits to shut the F up already. I am sick of him letting everyone and their mother assail everything he does. Reagan would have eaten these punks for lunch and do it with a smile.


21 posted on 02/15/2007 12:06:07 PM PST by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; Dog; ...

FYI Ping


22 posted on 02/15/2007 12:12:28 PM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
He did a pretty good job of dissing the House democrats yesterday in his press conference.

Good point just made on Rush by a caller: "Why is it that the fictional show "24" is supposed to affect the troops adversely, but the REAL actions of Congressmen, and their speech, is not supposed to have any effect on morale?"

That is an excellent point, as Rush said.

23 posted on 02/15/2007 12:17:24 PM PST by Miss Marple (Prayers for Jemian's son,: Lord, please keep him safe and bring him home .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Why don't they just cut the funding and be done with it?


24 posted on 02/15/2007 12:17:26 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Just called Senator McConnell's office to thank him for his efforts so far and hoped he had continued success in dealing with the likes of Biden.

Give a call of support, I'm sure it means a lot.

1-800-862-5530

25 posted on 02/15/2007 12:18:34 PM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Biden is just trying to do something to get people to quit thinking about his bash against Hillary, Edwards, and Osama Obama.

I DID hear on the radio news...that the Senate may have a Saturday session to debate and vote on the House's anti-war resolution....(that is if the GOP let's them).


26 posted on 02/15/2007 12:18:57 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Wonder what the folks who sought to 'punish' the President are thinking right about now.

A pox on them all.

27 posted on 02/15/2007 12:19:36 PM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Better yet - to repeal that authority - uhm - Doesn't the President have to sign it???

I don't see that happening anytime soon.


28 posted on 02/15/2007 12:20:30 PM PST by fremont_steve (Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Because they are cowards ... plus they want to bleed the President and our military



House Democrats' New Strategy: Force Slow End to War
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1784687/posts


29 posted on 02/15/2007 12:27:34 PM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
move to repeal the authority Congress gave President Bush in 2002 to send U.S. troops into Iraq

Wait a sec, I thought it was an illegal war?

According to another Democrat Presidential candidate, *she* thought the resolution was only to authorize further UN weapons inspections.

30 posted on 02/15/2007 12:30:00 PM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, will lie to anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Because they are cowards

They promised this before the election.

... plus they want to bleed the President and our military

They haven't given a damn about George W. Bush since he sought the office of POTUS, and they've loathed the military since rocks cooled. Now these a-holes hold the power in Congress. I'm not scared, I'm fed up to my eyebrows. They promise a lot of things. Nothing has changed.

31 posted on 02/15/2007 12:37:18 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Guess Joe's poll ratings must have taken another turn for the worse. He's going for the moonbats.
32 posted on 02/15/2007 12:39:31 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
I, for one, will NEVER forget their behavior since 2000. They have done nothing but undermine the President of the United States, embolden the terrorists and endanger our troops in a time of war. Their tactics are despicable. You are right the vendetta has gone way to far and they will pay for their frivolousness and partisan attacks.>
33 posted on 02/15/2007 12:42:43 PM PST by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; BigSkyFreeper

I hate them all.


34 posted on 02/15/2007 12:48:42 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Mo1 - are the Republicans fighting back at ALL?


35 posted on 02/15/2007 1:33:29 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Yes they are .. but there is only so much they can do because they don't control either house

The Dems won't allow any amendments or let them put forth their own resolutions ..

Reid says he will only let them if HE gets to pick their resolution

In the House they have been arguing against it ... but they don't have the #'s to stop from passing
In the Senate they aren't letting the dems have 60 votes for cloture
36 posted on 02/15/2007 1:44:09 PM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Biden needs to be reminded that the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces -- not Congress. Congress has no business defining the mission statement for our troops in Iraq or anywhere else.

To the extent that the War Powers Act is facially unConstitutional, of course you are correct.

However, any act that Congress is capable of enacting, it can repeal.

37 posted on 02/15/2007 1:46:20 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Yet, a poster just told me there's no differences between the two parties.


38 posted on 02/15/2007 1:46:43 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
they do not and will not have 67 votes in the Senate to override any veto

Are you sure about that?.

39 posted on 02/15/2007 1:47:55 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Oh, Mo. This is just making me sick for our troops. And for the country, since most people don't "get" what's going on. Our poor military families.


40 posted on 02/15/2007 1:48:49 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson