How will Rudy change Roe v. Wade while in office? (since he has said he will already appoint judges compatible with Chief Justice Roberts)
We've been over the judge thing.
His definition of "strict constructionist" is radically different than yours and mine.
That's like trusting Hitlery because she says she's against "judicial activism."
I'm addressing the article, which suggests that it's possible to be for traditional morality, for good versus evil, while killing millions of babies. No, it's not.
I would consider backing Rudy if he has the nomination and is running against hillary, but ONLY if it looks as if he agrees to take a responsibly pro-life position.
If pro-life Democrats are willing to flip over and kill babies in order to run for president, then I think Rudy could do the opposite.
He says he's a strict constructionist, but it's important to know what he means by that. In the past, he has said that it means total support for Roe v. Wade. He needs to commit himself to a change on life and family issues.