Doesn't do much good to advocate when you have liberals appointing liberals to the court where they can overrule you at every turn and or legislate their own agenda from the bench. We need to ensure that we run a pro life conservative so that we have the best shot at getting constitutionalists appointed to the bench. Oh, yeah, I know. Rudy will change his spots and appoint only Scalitos. Ho hum. Whoop do dee. Been there. Done that.
IMO you cannot take the judges Rudy appointed in NY and equate it to justices he would appoint as President. That is an apple and orange red herring thrown up on here by the Rudy haters.
In NYC as many of have pointed out the judges are recommended by a panel the Mayor appoints and come from the NY borroughs where the chances of finding a conservative lawyer who would make the merit roles in any borough is almost slim to none. You go with the hand you are dealt in a very liberal city.
He pushed for Scalia to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and was totally on board for Roberts and Alito. Do you not remember the justices that Pres Reagan appointed -- not exactly shining stars for conservatives. The comment about Gingsberg was taken out of context on here which seems to happen a lot recently.
All we are doing with Rudy is pointing out where he is conservative and some of those are issues a wide cross section of America supports. Rudy has never claimed to be a social conservative or flip flopped like others. He doesn't pander to the pro-life people by submitting a bill in the House that had no business being introduced and was DOA in a Democrat House. Why not submit it when Republicans had the House and Senate? That is pandering. All of a sudden a candidate turns conservative on issues he was never conservative -- that's also pandering.
As long as we are free to post on here as Rudy supporters we will continue to do so. If the day comes, that Rudy supporters are no longer welcome on this site, I would appreciate it if you would let me and others know personally. Until that day comes, we will continue in spite of the spam and half truths that get posted to us and name calling which is juvenile to continue to post for Rudy who is a Republican. If posters cannot handle an honest debate, then they have no business debating if all they can do is throw around insults or post spam IMHO.
If everyone agreed on a candidate in the primary, that candidate would most likely lose in the general. You have to become fire tested in the primary to get ready for the general when there is an open seat in the White House like this time. The more you get out about a candidate's negatives in the primary, the less ammunition you give the DemocRAT Party in the general. If you cover up like the Bush people did on the DUI, it can come back and bite you in the general. Let it all hang out in the primary. Every candidate should be under the same microscope that Rudy is being put under. If something is negative, get it out in pubic NOW not wait for the October surprise before the general election.
Thank you for freely allowing me to express my opinons.
As a wise old woman told me in Oklahoma who was the first Republican, first woman, and first Chickasaw elected to the State Legislature south of Oklahoma City, sometimes you have to agree to disagree.