Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US, UK 'worst places for children'
Al Jolson, uh...Jazerra ^ | WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2007 | Al jazerra

Posted on 02/14/2007 3:56:18 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet

Britain and the United States are the worst places in the industrialised world for children to live, according to a report by the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef).

They ranked among the bottom third in the study which looked at overall well-being, health and safety, education, relationships, risk and their own sense of well-being.

The study said that child poverty - defined as the percentage of children living in homes with incomes below 50 per cent of the national median - remains above the 15 per cent mark in Britain, the US and Ireland, as well as Spain, Portugal and Italy.

"The evidence from many countries persistently shows that children who grow up in poverty are more vulnerable," the report said, especially in terms of academic underachievement, chances of unemployment and low self-esteem.

Child well-being was rated highest in northern Europe, with the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark leading the list.

"All countries have weaknesses that need to be addressed and no country features in the top third of the rankings for all six dimensions," David Bull, the UK executive director of Unicef, said.

Risk behaviours

Britain lived up to its reputation for "binge-drinking," hazardous sexual activity and drug use, with the report putting the country at the bottom of the rankings for risk behaviours "by a considerable distance".

(Excerpt) Read more at english.aljazeera.net ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aljazeera; aljazerra; notsogreat; qatar; unitedkingdom; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: hoyaloya

Well, maybe we have a lot of single parents but the French practically have polygamy with all the married men having mistresses and wives being forced to turn a blind eye.


81 posted on 02/16/2007 11:16:21 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hoyaloya

Well, both my sister-in-law and brother are raising their kids as single parents. Not only do their children have all the material wealth they need, they are much loved, protected and educated. I can't believe any kid would rather be raised in Holland than the good ole USA! Boring!


82 posted on 02/16/2007 11:21:25 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
This is why, of course, millions yearly try to sneak across the border...to have and raise their children...

Idiots...

83 posted on 02/16/2007 11:25:50 AM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safeasthebanks

>>> Anything else stupid you'd like to add, Fritz?

yeah... stabilize your $ please - don't spend more then you have and ask Mr. Klinsmann if he'd like to teach you a proper sport.

Elect a president that has an eye on monetary politics.

And don't tell me the US helped in WWII because they wanted to save the jews.


84 posted on 02/19/2007 1:59:51 AM PST by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cinives

Congratulations to your brain anyhow...

Bernanke should have listened much better to this guy.


85 posted on 02/19/2007 2:06:45 AM PST by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
"Remember those long-ago Halloweens collecting UNICEF money for the poor kids of the world? It turns out that those little bastards should have been collecting money for us instead!!"

I take a little offense at that....
45 years ago I did trick or treat for UNICEF with my church group. Of course back then the UN meant something.
86 posted on 02/19/2007 2:19:56 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

They stood for nothing more then than they do today - you just get more insight into their socialist bias with different news sources.


87 posted on 02/19/2007 5:01:16 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

Yep - and I should add, I'm still a fan of his today. The work of Rothbard, Hazlitt, Carson(not Rachel), Kirschner, and the rest are the voices of sanity in today's world.


88 posted on 02/19/2007 5:03:32 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

On that last you are correct - but IMO we redeemed ourselves by supporting Israel in the 40s and beyond thanks to Truman, not FDR.


89 posted on 02/19/2007 5:05:21 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

could it be the high concentration of liberals are at fault??


90 posted on 02/19/2007 5:08:18 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinives

yup.


91 posted on 02/19/2007 5:15:44 AM PST by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson